Using an unreliable narrator can create excitement and tension.
An author may use an unreliable narrator to create tension and intrigue, compelling readers to question the truth of the narrative. This technique allows for deeper exploration of themes such as perception, memory, and subjectivity, encouraging readers to engage critically with the story. Additionally, an unreliable narrator can add complexity to character development, revealing biases and motivations that challenge the reader's understanding of the plot. Ultimately, it can enhance the overall reading experience by inviting multiple interpretations.
An unreliable narrator would reflect their bias in their telling of the story.
Yes, the omniscient narrator is expected to tell the truth in a story. This narrator is all-knowing and presents information objectively, providing insight into characters and events from a neutral perspective. Misleading information would compromise the narrator's reliability and the overall credibility of the story.
The literary device you are referring to is an unreliable narrator. This narrator's credibility is called into question due to their compromised perspective, which can result from a variety of reasons such as mental instability, personal biases, or intentional deceit. Readers must critically assess the information presented by an unreliable narrator to uncover the truth of the narrative.
The narrator would be considered unreliable. This type of narration can create tension and intrigue for the reader as they try to discern the truth from the narrator's perspective.
To make the reader question the narrator’s credibility and trustworthiness.
First of all, Edgar Allan Poe is not the narrator of the story, he is the author, make sure you make that distinction. Montressor is the narrator of the story, he's the one telling his close friend of what happened with Fortunato. Montressor can be considered an unreliable narrator because fifty years has passed and he is an old man now who has obviously cooled off about the whole situation. He also may be considered an unreliable narrator because he is so tricky throughout the story that maybe he's manipulating the reader.
Catherine is very "unreliable", she is never there when I need her help.
One reason would be to show the same event from different perspectives. Another would be to show you what happened during events at which the main narrator was not present.
It would be helpful to include the excerpt from "The Tell-Tale Heart" in order to provide an accurate response.
Unreliable
A narrator who would tell more about facts and less about feelings would be an objective narrator. A narrator who would tell more about feelings would be a subjective narrator.