Oh, dude, Shakespeare was all about those dramatic flair moments, you know? Using apostrophe, where Macbeth talks directly to the dagger like it's his BFF, adds that extra touch of crazy to the scene. It's like he's having a deep convo with a piece of metal, man. So, yeah, it's all about that theatrical effect and making Macbeth seem like he's losing his marbles.
Shakespeare used apostrophe in Macbeth's soliloquy to create dramatic effect and emphasize Macbeth's hallucinations and inner turmoil. By having Macbeth address the dagger directly, it allows the audience to see the depth of his psychological struggle and descent into madness. It also adds an element of tension and suspense to the scene.
Shakespeare's use of apostrophe allows for a more dramatic and emotive portrayal of the dagger. By personifying the dagger and addressing it directly, Shakespeare creates a sense of intimacy and psychological depth in Macbeth's hallucination. This technique adds to the tension and suspense in the scene, enhancing the overall impact on the audience.
Shakespeare, duhhh!
The word Gordon does not appear in Macbeth or any of Shakespeare's works.
Having Macbeth describe it would be less dramatic. People often forget that Shakespeare was writing plays, and the rule in writing plays is "show, don't tell". From time to time Shakespeare feels constrained to have a character describe something in the middle of a play, because what is being described is hard or improper to stage or not worth staging For example, in Act 1 Scene 2 of Macbeth, the sergeant describes the battle, rather than going through the difficulty of staging it just to provide background. And in Taming of the Shrew we get a description of the wedding because it would be improper to portray a wedding on stage. However, it is much more effective to get the information out by having the characters interact with each other, with props or, as in this case, with figments of their imagination. Having Macbeth say, "The dagger appears to be insubstantial as it cannot actually be grasped and does not lose its form when a hand is passed through it" is pathetically limp compared to "Come! Let me clutch thee! I have thee not, and yet I see thee still!"
Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare's play Macbeth says, 'You know your own degrees'
William Shakespeare wrote Macbeth
Macbeth in Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Macbeth Lear in Shakespeare's King Lear Hamlet in Shakespeare's Hamlet Brutus in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
In Shakespeare's play "Macbeth," the character Macbeth describes his crown as a "fruitless crown" that he has gained by committing murder and betraying those around him. He sees it as a symbol of his empty victory, tainted by guilt and regret.
Shakespeare was a man and Anne was a woman. Coincidentally the same applies to Macbeth and Lady Macbeth.
Both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are necessary for the play. Neither would have murdered Duncan without the other. Shakespeare also wanted to explore the effects on their relationship of the guilt they experience after the murder.
I assume you meant "Why did Shakespeare make Macbeth a villan?" Well, what could the storyline have been if he wasn't a villan? Shakespeare's Macbeth was based on the real Macbeth. He murdered his king, Duncan, and became king. I guess that means that the real Macbeth was a villan, and so Shakespeare only kept it that way, showing it wasn't Shakespeare that made his character of Macbeth a villan.