No, a joint owner cannot rent a property without the consent of the other owner.
No, one can't sell or borrow against the property without the other person signing off on the loan. You can choose to sell the property and split the costs.
No, one joint owner with the right of survivorship cannot unilaterally pledge the joint property as collateral for a loan from the other joint owner without the consent of the other owner. The right of survivorship means that both owners have equal rights to the property, and any significant action regarding the property, such as pledging it as collateral, typically requires the agreement of both parties. Additionally, such an action could complicate the ownership rights and potentially violate the terms of the joint ownership.
This sounds like a real mess. It sounds like two joint tenants own a piece of property in common with one having the mortgage in his name. The other joint tenant has a piece of property that has a home equity loan about to go into default. In one state the joint tenant with the home equity in default would lose that piece of property. It would not affect the piece of property he or she owned with a different person.
No
Joint tenants own 100% of the total each. If one puts a lean on their part then its only on 50%. If that person dies the other owns the whole 100 % without question. You cannot desolve a joint tenacy unless you sell your half or joint tenent dies. If the leans of the other joint partner is against a joint property and he dies then his half automatically goes to his joint partner and the person putting debt on his 50% is redundant because it is someone else's 100% after death. This person might have to sue the other person for his lean on the joint ownership but he might not win.
No, one can't sell or borrow against the property without the other person signing off on the loan. You can choose to sell the property and split the costs.
"Joint" means just that ... it requires multiple signatures to sell property. Contact a lawyer.
No, one joint owner with the right of survivorship cannot unilaterally pledge the joint property as collateral for a loan from the other joint owner without the consent of the other owner. The right of survivorship means that both owners have equal rights to the property, and any significant action regarding the property, such as pledging it as collateral, typically requires the agreement of both parties. Additionally, such an action could complicate the ownership rights and potentially violate the terms of the joint ownership.
You can only encumber your own interest in the property. You cannot affect the co-tenant's interest in the property without their consent.
No, it is generally not possible to sell a house without the consent of all owners listed on the property title.
In a joint tenancy, all owners have equal rights to the property, and any decision affecting the property typically requires the agreement of all joint tenants. Therefore, if only two of the four joint tenants attempt to create a trust for the property, it may not be legally valid without the consent of the other two. All joint tenants must agree to any significant changes regarding ownership or management of the property. It's advisable to seek legal counsel in such situations to ensure compliance with property laws.
The co-owner can only transfer their own interest in the property. If there are four owners the interest of one would be a one-quarter interest. A co-owner can transfer their own interest in the property without the consent of the others.
With cash of course......Yes... Spousal Consent would be needed if the property was to be purchased by taking out a loan in both spouses names...But there are no laws requiring spousal consent for another spouse to make cash purchases of property...
You cannot make any changes to the other owner's interest in the property without that owner's consent and signature. For example, if you sell the property the grantee will only receive your own one-half interest.
Yes, in Ohio, if there are multiple heirs to a property, one heir can sell their share without the consent of the other heirs. Each co-owner has the right to sell or transfer their interest in the property without approval from the other co-owners.
Shouldn't, but mothers do it anyway.
Possibly. It depends, in part, upon the structure of the venture. For example, in a partnership, you may need unanimous consent of the other partners before offering your portion outside of the partnership itself. If the joint venture is merely a contractual relationship between two companies, the contract will often prevent either member of the joint venture from disposing of its interest without the consent of the other member.