Yes. The banking institution does not know an account is subject to levy/garnishment until the order is served. In a few instances the account holder will have minimal notification (24 hrs). However, once the order is served no action can be taken by the account holder to protect the funds. An exception in some cases is a joint account where only one person is the named judgment debtor and/or an account contains funds that are exempted under state or federal law. If such is the case the account will be 'frozen' until it can be determined what percentage of the funds belong to each account holder.
They cannot be taken without due process in the US. They can certainly be garnished or a lien put against them if the court has ordered it. It should be fully explained to you prior to it happening.
no
Wages should not be garnished prior to a court order. You should be able to argue before a judge that you do not owe a bill because a man did not complete the work. You are not bound to pay him until he finishes the job. If he did not fix your car, he should not garnish your wages for refusing to fix it.
No. A bank cannot do that. A bank cannot transfer money from one account to another without prior approval or permission from the account holder from whose account money is going to be taken. If such a thing happens, the affected customer can sue the bank.
If you received money that you were not entitled to and you deposited the insurance check into your bank account and the money was a payout from an insurance claim, the insurance company can swipe the money out of your account without your prior knowledge for up to 3 years. If you received money as a result of a criminal act, the statute of limitations for that crime would guide the insurance company's timeline.
They cannot be taken without due process in the US. They can certainly be garnished or a lien put against them if the court has ordered it. It should be fully explained to you prior to it happening.
no
Yes. As long as the brother and the mother agree to it, it is no one else's business.
Activating prior knowledge
no
Wages should not be garnished prior to a court order. You should be able to argue before a judge that you do not owe a bill because a man did not complete the work. You are not bound to pay him until he finishes the job. If he did not fix your car, he should not garnish your wages for refusing to fix it.
No. A bank cannot do that. A bank cannot transfer money from one account to another without prior approval or permission from the account holder from whose account money is going to be taken. If such a thing happens, the affected customer can sue the bank.
Prior knowledge allows you to make a well-informed hypotheses and a better-planned experiment.
The reading strategy that involves combining your prior knowledge with new information is inferences. When you make inferences you use reasoning, which combines you prior knowledge with new information.
Without prior knowledge of the value of q or r, it is impossible to calculate the answer to this equation.
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.
An experimental question is based on prior knowledge. This type of question can also be tested and will have an answer.