0
What else can I help you with?
Why is the NPV method superior to payback method?
How is the method superior to the payback method
Is superior plus corp a buy?
Yes
Does Superior Equity Corporation still exist?
No
Is wealth maximization superior to profit?
yes
Why are burecratic organizations technically superior to other organization?
They are not
Is a respondeat superior malpractice based on negligence caused by an accident?
is a respondeat superior
What is another term for vicarious liability?
Respondeat Superior.
What is the Latin form for Let the master answer?
respondeat superior
Let the master answer describes the legal doctrine?
Respondeat superior
The doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply between the physician and the?
pharmacist
Is direct liability the same as respondeat superior liability?
Direct liability is holding the actor responsible for his or her own actions. Respondeat superior liability is holding an employer responsible for an employee's actions.
What is 'Respondeat superior' when translated from Latin to English?
"Let (the) superior respond" is an English equivalent of the Latin phrase Respondeat superior. The phrase most famously references the liability of an employer for wrongful actions within the scope of an employee's job position. The pronunciation will be "res-PON-dey-at SOO-pey-ree-or" in Church and classical Latin.
What is difference between res ipsa loquitur and respondeat?
res ipsa loquitur - the thing (matter ) explains itself. It is self evident. respondeat [superior]: let [the master] answer - the employer is liable for the actions of an employee
What is respondent superior?
Respondeat Superior rule states that Principle (Employer) is liable for all the unauthorized acts of the agent (employee) performed within the course of his employment.
A theory under which an employer may be held liable for the torts of the employee is called?
Vicarious liability or "respondeat superior."
Can an employee be sued if the employer is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior?
Actually, the employee must be sued in order for the respondeat superior doctrine to apply. Respondeat superior doctrine only imposes liability on the principal for tortuous acts committed by the agent; the agent must therefore be found guilty of having committed the tort before any liability can be assigned to the principal. S.C., Paralegal Sciences Major, Kaplan University.
What is the difference between vicarious liability and respondeat superior in terms of holding an employer legally responsible for the actions of their employees?
Vicarious liability and respondeat superior are legal concepts that hold employers responsible for the actions of their employees. Vicarious liability means the employer is held responsible for the actions of their employees, even if the employer did not directly cause the harm. Respondeat superior is a specific type of vicarious liability that holds the employer responsible for the actions of an employee if the employee was acting within the scope of their employment when the harm occurred.
