What was the cost of an average engagement ring in the 1950's?

Answer 1

Well, darling, back in the 1950s, the average cost of an engagement ring was around one to two months' salary. So, if your man was bringing home the big bucks, you might have scored a sparkler worth a few hundred bucks. But hey, love doesn't have a price tag, right?

Answer 2

Oh, dude, back in the 1950s, the average cost of an engagement ring was around $200-$500. Can you imagine spending that much on a shiny rock? Like, priorities, right? But hey, if it worked for your grandparents, who am I to judge?

Answer 3

Ah, back in the 1950s, the average cost of an engagement ring was around one to two months' salary. It's important to remember that the value of a ring isn't just in its price, but in the love and commitment it represents. Whether it's a simple band or a sparkling diamond, what truly matters is the love and joy it brings to your heart.

Answer 4

In the 1950s, the average cost of an engagement ring typically ranged from $100 to $500, depending on factors such as the quality of the diamond and the setting. However, it's important to note that these values can vary widely based on individual preferences and financial circumstances. Additionally, inflation and changes in consumer behavior over the decades have significantly impacted the average cost of engagement rings in more recent years.

Answer 5

Back in the 1950s engagement rings ranged in price from a few hundred dollars and up depending on the style, diamond size, and metal type. Remember, this period was shortly after the war, and money was tight. A small diamond (.15 carat) solitaire white gold ring would cost around $100 at that time. A ring with a .25 carat stone done in platinum would cost roughly $300 to $400. Any ring that was a filigree setting or had accent stones would cost more, due to the workmanship and additional stones.

Answer 6

£100

Answer 7

100