answersLogoWhite

0

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

Sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners could potentially face eviction from the land they were farming. They might also lose access to essential resources needed to sustain their livelihoods, leading to greater financial struggles and poverty.


What would happen to sharecroppers who would not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?

Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.


What would happen to sharecroppers who couldn't pay their debts to landowners?

When sharecroppers couldnÃ?t pay their debt, they were often forced to grow crops just for selling, to pay back debt. For instance, they would have to grow cotton, instead of crops that were edible.


Ask us anythingA way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?

Landowners often took advantage of sharecroppers by imposing unfair contracts that heavily favored the landowners, resulting in sharecroppers receiving a minimal portion of the crop yield. They would also charge high prices for supplies and rent, making it difficult for sharecroppers to escape a cycle of debt. This exploitation perpetuated economic dependency and limited the ability of sharecroppers to improve their living conditions.


A f amily farmed a portion of a white landowners land in return for housing a share of the crop?

They would be sharecroppers.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowner in post civil war?

In the post-Civil War South, sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners often faced severe consequences. They could be subjected to eviction from the land they worked, and their inability to settle debts could lead to a cycle of debt peonage, where they remained bound to the land under oppressive terms. Additionally, they might face legal action, which could result in imprisonment or forced labor to repay their obligations. This perpetuated a cycle of poverty and dependence, making it difficult for sharecroppers to achieve economic independence.


What would happen if the sharecroppers were put into a chain gang?

This Austale Owens


Did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers make their living?

Corn


Who owned land of sharecropping?

In a sharecropping system, the land was typically owned by wealthy landowners or plantation owners who had large tracts of land. Sharecroppers, often poor farmers, would work the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced, rather than receiving a fixed wage. This arrangement often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of debt and poverty, as they had to pay for supplies and rent from the landowner. Thus, while landowners retained ownership, sharecroppers provided the labor necessary for farming.


What were farmers called when they agreed to give most of their harvest to landowners in exchange in use of the land seed and tools?

Farmers who agreed to give most of their harvest to landowners in exchange for the use of land, seeds, and tools were called "sharecroppers." This system was prevalent in the post-Civil War Southern United States, where sharecroppers, often former slaves, would work the land in return for a share of the crop produced. However, the arrangement often led to a cycle of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers.