answersLogoWhite

0

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

Sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners could potentially face eviction from the land they were farming. They might also lose access to essential resources needed to sustain their livelihoods, leading to greater financial struggles and poverty.


What would happen to sharecroppers who would not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?

Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.


What would happen to sharecroppers who couldn't pay their debts to landowners?

When sharecroppers couldnÃ?t pay their debt, they were often forced to grow crops just for selling, to pay back debt. For instance, they would have to grow cotton, instead of crops that were edible.


A f amily farmed a portion of a white landowners land in return for housing a share of the crop?

They would be sharecroppers.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowner in post civil war?

In the post-Civil War South, sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners often faced severe consequences. They could be subjected to eviction from the land they worked, and their inability to settle debts could lead to a cycle of debt peonage, where they remained bound to the land under oppressive terms. Additionally, they might face legal action, which could result in imprisonment or forced labor to repay their obligations. This perpetuated a cycle of poverty and dependence, making it difficult for sharecroppers to achieve economic independence.


What would happen if the sharecroppers were put into a chain gang?

This Austale Owens


Did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers make their living?

Corn


Who were the sharecroppers during the Reconstruction Era?

During the Reconstruction Era, sharecroppers were predominantly African American farmers who, after the Civil War, worked on land owned by white landowners. They would farm a portion of the land and, in return, pay a share of the crops they produced as rent. This system, while intended to provide economic opportunity, often led to cycles of debt and poverty, as sharecroppers had to borrow money for supplies and were frequently exploited by landowners. Ultimately, sharecropping perpetuated a form of economic dependency and inequality in the South.


What are the traps that tied sharecroppers to the land?

Sharecroppers were forced to buy tools and seed from their landowners for exorbitant prices. When the harvest came in, the crops were sold for barely enough to pay off the loans the sharecroppers took out to eat and survive. This left little to pay off the debt that they owed.


Why were black sharecroppers unsuccessful?

Sharecroppers were charged high interest rates and had to give a portion of their crops to the landowners. This meant that most sharecroppers lived in poverty with little chance to own land or homes of their own.