answersLogoWhite

0

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners?

Sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners could potentially face eviction from the land they were farming. They might also lose access to essential resources needed to sustain their livelihoods, leading to greater financial struggles and poverty.


What would happen to sharecroppers who would not pay their debts to landowners?

They would be indebted to the landowners. They would have to find other ways to pay for the debts or be stuck to the land until it was paid off.


What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?

Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.


What would happen to sharecroppers who couldn't pay their debts to landowners?

When sharecroppers couldnÃ?t pay their debt, they were often forced to grow crops just for selling, to pay back debt. For instance, they would have to grow cotton, instead of crops that were edible.


A f amily farmed a portion of a white landowners land in return for housing a share of the crop?

They would be sharecroppers.


What would happen to sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowner in post civil war?

In the post-Civil War South, sharecroppers who could not pay their debts to landowners often faced severe consequences. They could be subjected to eviction from the land they worked, and their inability to settle debts could lead to a cycle of debt peonage, where they remained bound to the land under oppressive terms. Additionally, they might face legal action, which could result in imprisonment or forced labor to repay their obligations. This perpetuated a cycle of poverty and dependence, making it difficult for sharecroppers to achieve economic independence.


What would happen if the sharecroppers were put into a chain gang?

This Austale Owens


Did most sharecroppers and tenant farmers make their living?

Corn


Who owned land of sharecropping?

In a sharecropping system, the land was typically owned by wealthy landowners or plantation owners who had large tracts of land. Sharecroppers, often poor farmers, would work the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced, rather than receiving a fixed wage. This arrangement often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of debt and poverty, as they had to pay for supplies and rent from the landowner. Thus, while landowners retained ownership, sharecroppers provided the labor necessary for farming.


What is a person who shared a crop with landowners?

A person who shared a crop with landowners is typically referred to as a sharecropper. Sharecroppers would farm the land owned by someone else and, in return, they would give a portion of the crops produced to the landowner as rent. This system often arose in the post-Civil War Southern United States, where it allowed landowners to maintain their agricultural operations while providing labor for those who lacked their own land. However, it often resulted in a cycle of poverty for the sharecroppers due to exploitative practices and economic dependence.


Who were the sharecroppers during the Reconstruction Era?

During the Reconstruction Era, sharecroppers were predominantly African American farmers who, after the Civil War, worked on land owned by white landowners. They would farm a portion of the land and, in return, pay a share of the crops they produced as rent. This system, while intended to provide economic opportunity, often led to cycles of debt and poverty, as sharecroppers had to borrow money for supplies and were frequently exploited by landowners. Ultimately, sharecropping perpetuated a form of economic dependency and inequality in the South.