One would assume that the brighter, livelier and more "flashy" the male is the more likely he is to gain access to a mate.
Because of the environment they live in.
Because of the environment they live in.
Because of the environment they live in.
Because of the environment they live in.
One would assume that the brighter, livelier and more "flashy" the male is the more likely he is to gain access to a mate.
One would assume that the brighter, livelier and more "flashy" the male is the more likely he is to gain access to a mate.
Because their population grows and their thing grows ;)
Natural selection and sexual selection are both mechanisms of evolution, but they differ in how they shape species. Natural selection acts on traits that affect an organism's survival and ability to reproduce in its environment, leading to adaptations that increase survival and reproduction. Sexual selection, on the other hand, acts on traits that affect an organism's ability to attract mates and reproduce, leading to the development of traits that enhance mating success. In summary, natural selection primarily influences survival and reproductive success in the environment, while sexual selection primarily influences mating success and reproductive opportunities.
Around one or two months.
Non-random mating is otherwise known as sexual selection. Some see this as distinct from natural selection, but I think that sexual selection is merely a form of, or perhaps more a complication of natural selection. Selection, natural or sexual, is the effect that "guides" evolution, that allows evolution to produce populations suited to their environment.
This is called, sexual selection.
sexual selection