There are four main types of grammars in formal language theory, classified by the Chomsky hierarchy: Type 0 (recursively enumerable grammars), Type 1 (context-sensitive grammars), Type 2 (context-free grammars), and Type 3 (regular grammars). Each type has different generative power and constraints, with Type 3 being the simplest and Type 0 being the most complex. These grammars are used to define and analyze the syntax of programming languages and natural languages.
Regular expressions and context-free grammars are both formal languages used in computer science to describe patterns in strings. Regular expressions are simpler and more limited in their expressive power, while context-free grammars are more complex and can describe a wider range of patterns. Regular expressions can be converted into context-free grammars, but not all context-free grammars can be represented by regular expressions.
In general, finite state machines can model regular grammars. Deterministic finite automata can represent deterministic context-free grammars. Non-deterministic finite automata can represent context-free grammars.
1957
Better grammars.
-Single pass compiler -Multi pass compiler -Cross compiler -Optimizing compiler
You can find context-free grammars for specific languages in academic textbooks, research papers, or online resources dedicated to formal language theory and automata theory. These resources typically provide detailed explanations and examples of context-free grammars for various languages.
A context-free grammar can generate languages that regular grammars cannot, as it allows for the use of non-terminal symbols in productions. Regular grammars, on the other hand, are less powerful and can only generate regular languages, which are a subset of context-free languages. Context-free grammars are more expressive and have more flexibility in rule definitions compared to regular grammars.
Examples of transformational grammars include Chomsky's phrase structure grammar and tree-adjoining grammar. These grammars employ transformational rules to generate sentences by transforming basic phrase structure trees according to specific syntactic operations. Transformational grammars are used in linguistics to study the underlying structure of language.
Nick Parkes has written: 'Process grammars'
Because you're grammars are very corrects, mister.
spelling grammars structures contexts
they is works with good grammars. I don't know, that question is too broad.