You can hypothesize that those in the wild will be healthier. This is because they are in their natural habitat.
The hypothesis could be: "Salmon raised in fish farms will have higher levels of toxins, such as mercury, compared to salmon caught in the wild." This hypothesis can be tested by analyzing the toxin levels in both groups of salmon and comparing the results.
the metal caught the lightning and he did not get eletrocuted
To test the hypothesis, your class can place the five pit traps in different locations: near the cafeteria, the gym, and the library. Leave them for a specified duration to catch insects. After the time elapses, count and compare the number of insects caught in each trap. If more insects are caught near the cafeteria, then the hypothesis that more insects are trapped near the cafeteria would be supported.
The dependent variable in this experiment is the number of animals caught in the pit traps after three days.
At least one mouses had the disease. The others caught it.
It is important to tie back long hair during an experiment to prevent it from getting caught in equipment or chemicals, which could be dangerous. This helps maintain a safe and clean work environment.
Edward Jenner's evidence for his idea that vaccination could protect against smallpox came from his observations of milkmaids who had previously caught cowpox, a similar but less severe disease. He tested his hypothesis by inoculating a young boy with cowpox and then exposing him to smallpox, showing that he was protected from the more serious disease. This experiment laid the foundation for the development of vaccination as a key tool in preventing infectious diseases.
While the idea is imaginative, it is not supported by current scientific evidence. The prevailing theory is that the moon formed from debris created by a giant impact between Earth and a Mars-sized body early in the history of the solar system. The hypothesis you mentioned would need substantial empirical evidence and scientific validation to become a theory.
Caught. For example, I caught a bird. She caught the train. The prisoner was caught.
have caught - for plural subjectsThey have caught colds.The policemen have caught colds.has caught - for singular subjects.She has caught a cold.The policeman has caught a cold
I caught it! or I caught a cold.
There is no difference between the meaning - they both mean the same thing (although I think 'was caught' makes a little more sense than 'got caught.') The only real difference is the limiting of subjects.Like, for 'was caught,' the subject is limited to I was caught and he/she was caught. If you wanted to use you, they, or we, it would be were caught.But for 'got caught,' anyone can get caught. I got caught, you got caught, we got caught, they got caught, and she/he got caught all makes sense and is grammatically correct.