Hershey and Chase conducted their famous experiment using bacteriophages, which are viruses that infect bacteria. They labeled the protein coat of the phage with radioactive sulfur and the DNA with radioactive phosphorus. By allowing the labeled phages to infect bacteria and then separating the viral coats from the bacterial cells, they observed that only the phosphorus-labeled DNA entered the bacteria, while the sulfur-labeled protein remained outside. This provided strong evidence that genes are made of DNA, not proteins.
One can differentiate between orthologs and paralogs in a set of genes or proteins by comparing their evolutionary relationships. Orthologs are genes or proteins in different species that evolved from a common ancestor through speciation, while paralogs are genes or proteins within the same species that evolved from a gene duplication event. By analyzing the evolutionary history and sequence similarity of the genes or proteins in question, one can determine whether they are orthologs or paralogs.
No, proteins do not determine genes. Genes are segments of DNA that encode instructions for making proteins. Proteins are the products of gene expression, meaning that genes are responsible for determining the sequence and structure of proteins.
Simply put, DNA is the genetic material, not protein. At that time no one was quite sure which was which. A clever experiment by Hersey and Chase settled this question. Google that experiment.
Genes contain instructions for building proteins.
Genes code for proteins
Genes contain our DNA. Proteins are synthesized according to data on DNA
Yes, proteins do not code for genes in the process of genetic expression. Genes code for proteins through the process of transcription and translation.
Genes produce proteins and what we are is determined by genes.
Genes are transcribed to make Proteins
Genes carry the instructions to make proteins, i think....
Yes, genes contain the instructions for making proteins in living organisms.
Methyl groups