Neither because a fish bowl could be about two liters. 2 liters (2 l)
The abbreviation for liters is a lower case letter "L" : l which in some typefaces can be confused with a "one" :1
The prefix M is Mega and means one million [1000000]
the prefix m is milli and means one thousandth [1/1000]
In theory, you could have a 2 mL fish bowl, but you could only put a very small fish in it. The 1 L fish bowl would be a better choice.
A fish bowl is typically measured in liters (L) rather than milliliters (ml) due to its larger volume capacity. Fish bowls can range in size from a few liters to tens of liters, making liters a more practical unit of measurement for these larger volumes.
2 L is greater than 200 mL.2 L = 2000 mL > 2 mL
2 L is more than 2 mL.2 L = 2000 mL > 2 mL
I am under the impression that you mean milliliters (mL). There are 1000 mL in each litre. 2 L is equal to 2000 mL.
1 L = 1,000 ml 2 L = 2,000 ml 3 L = 3,000 ml . . . 58 L = 58,000 ml 58.6 L = 58,600 mL
20 l 2,000 ml = 2 l
Yes. 300 mL is less than 2 L2 L = 2000 mL > 300 mL
Yes, 200 mL is equal to 0.2 L, since 1 liter is equal to 1000 milliliters. Therefore, 200 mL is a fraction of 2 L, specifically one-tenth of it. So, 200 mL in 2 L equals 0.1 or 10% of 2 L.
71/2 L = 7500 mL
No. A litre is a thousand times greater than a millilitre. This means that 2 L is equal to 2000 mL, which is a thousand times greater than 2 mL.
1 L = 1,000 ml 500 ml = 1/2 L . . . That's smaller than a whole L .