Bombing al-Qaeda can be seen as a tactical approach to weaken terrorist networks and disrupt their operations. However, it also carries the risk of civilian casualties, potential backlash, and the possibility of further radicalization. A comprehensive strategy that includes intelligence, diplomacy, and addressing underlying grievances may be more effective in the long term. Ultimately, the decision depends on the specific context and potential consequences of military action.
No. Bombing other countries are not the best idea. Never try bombing other country and never do it at all.
"Alkida" is not a widely recognized term or concept in English. However, it may be a misspelling or variation of "Al-Qaeda," which is a militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden in the late 1980s. If you meant something else by "alkida," please provide more context for a more accurate answer.
We are presently in a situation where we are trying to kill them before they kill us. This is an unfortunate position, and if the US had played its cards better, it could have avoided the whole conflict in the first place. But now that the conflict exists, our options are more limited. So yes, bombing al queda is a good idea.
yes it was started by Bush and Obama continues to fund this organazation
The five main ones are alkida Taliban Hezbollah Hamas and debatably the Muslim brotherhood
morale and propaganda.
There is no argument - it happened.
The Great Physicst Albert Einstein
Google images.
The opposite of a good idea would be a bad idea. Depending on how bad you could also say terrible idea.
You will have to give us more information to get a real answer. Good questions = good answers.
A good One