No, it is not. It is considered extreme imagination, bordering on lunacy.
no because cannibalism refers only to the eating of human flesh. since angels are not human therefore if baby Jesus eats an angel, it will not be considered as cannibalism. other definition of cannibalism is the eating of the flesh of the same kind. If baby Jesus was born to be human as the bible states, then eating of angels does not make him a cannibal.
No, eating an ape would not be considered cannibalism. Cannibalism refers specifically to the act of consuming individuals of one's own species. Since humans and apes are different species, consuming an ape does not fall under the definition of cannibalism.
The correct spelling is cannibalism (eating humans, or the same species).
The very thought of the natives' cannibalism is eating me alive...
The eating of people by people is anthropophagy (People-eating). Cannibalism itself is the eating of members of the same species so the technical term is homophagy (Same-eating)
Cannibalism is the act of eating your own kind. Cannibalism is widespread among animals because there are often food shortages.
No. It is the result of anxiety. Cannabalism involves eating flesh. Fingernails are composed of keratin, which are nonliving cells.
The only person who eats cannibal would be the cannibals. Cannibalism is eating human flesh which is illegal in most countries. Eating oneself is also cannibalism.
Ritualistic cannibalism, I suspect, would be the act of eating the flesh of your own species as part of a ritual.
Yes! the definition of a cannibal is someone or something that eats its own kind
Animal cannibalism.
Cannibalism