No, King Henry IV of France was not the direct sponsor of Samuel de Champlain. However, Henry IV did support French exploration and colonization efforts in North America, which created an environment that allowed Champlain to undertake his expeditions. Champlain was later sponsored by the French crown under King Louis XIII and the Company of New France.
Samuel de Champlain was sponsored by King Henry IV of France to establish and develop New France in North America. King Henry IV supported Champlain's exploration and colonization efforts in the early 17th century.
France. He claimed eastern Canada as New France, and founded Quebec City.
King Henry IV did not send Samuel de Champlain to explore. Samuel de Champlain was actually sponsored by the French government and the fur trading company, the Company of One Hundred Associates, to explore and establish French colonies in North America.
Samuel de Champlain's explorations in North America were primarily sponsored by the French government and the fur trading company, the Company of One Hundred Associates. He was also supported by French merchants and investors interested in expanding French influence in the region.
Samuel de Champlain got money for his first trip from King Henry IV (the fourth)
The country of France under King Henry IV sponsored the settlement of Quebec which was founded by Samuel de Champlain on 3 July 1608.
king Henry III did
He was from England
No Henry Hudson did not shoot Samuel De Champlain Samuel de Champlain was born in 1567 and died in 1635 while Henry Hudson was born in 1570 and died in 1611. And Both of them Did not meet and Henry Hudson reason of death was got abanded by crew and put on small boat to starve to death .
King Henry IV rewarded him with a pension!
Samuel de Champlain was responsible for founding New France and Quebec City in 1608. He was employed by Henry IV from France.
probably himself because King Henry IV didn't come along with Champlain