HAVE eaten is correct where as HAD eaten is not.
A Tundra is a truck; a dessert is a confection eaten after a meal.
A seed is grown in the ground to grow a plant. A nut has a seed in the sheel that can be eaten.
One has eaten to much and wont care And a pregnant cat will probly be protective of her baby.
Ate is a past tense verb while eaten is not
a substance crop is freshly grown wash and eaten , a cash crop is applied with chemicals
The main difference between plums and prunes is that prunes are dried plums. Prunes have a higher sugar content and are often used for their laxative properties, while plums are fresh fruits that are typically eaten raw.
britle stars are small and live in coral reefs and are eaten by GIANT sea stars
Milkfish can be eaten. It is one of the staple fish in the Philippines. Goldfish is a fish for aquariums also ideal for pets
A meal is something like lunch or dinner. A mango is eaten like a snack or a side dish.
The difference is that generally - but not always - in the construction "you have not" the word HAVE serves as an auxiliary, not as the main verb, whereas in the construction "you do not have" the word HAVE is always the main verb. For example You have not eaten your broccoli so you do not have a clean plate.
The difference is under the rules of English grammar, "I have eaten" (the past participle form of the word "eat") makes sense, while "I have ate" (the simple past tense form of the word "eat) does not. "I ate" does make sense, however, and it has the same meaning as "I have eaten".
One Is the description of a human male presumably of African descent. The other is flat Italian food often eaten with black people