answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is arguable?

claim


What is an arguable statement?

claim


What is arguable statement?

claim


which statement about the claim is true?

It is both arguable and defensible.


What is the most recognizable college class ring?

It's arguable. A lot of schools claim its theirs.


What is the difference between a claim and a fact?

Facts are unarguable and proven, claims are arguable but contain evidence as well.


If you wrote an essay about upon which would be an appropriate thesis statement?

An arguable claim about the poem


Which sentence is a claim that is both arguable and defensible?

Improving bicycle lanes would reduce road accidents


What are the qualities that make a claim arguable?

An arguable claim possesses several key qualities: it is specific and clear, allowing for a focused discussion; it presents a debatable assertion, meaning reasonable people can disagree; it is supported by evidence or reasoning that can be scrutinized; and it addresses a relevant issue or topic that invites differing perspectives. These qualities ensure that the claim can stimulate critical thinking and meaningful dialogue.


What is an arguable thesis?

An arguable thesis is a statement that presents a clear position on an issue or topic that is open to debate or interpretation. It typically takes a stance that can be supported or refuted with evidence and reasoning. A strong arguable thesis will challenge the reader to consider different perspectives and engage in critical thinking.


"Earth is the third planet from the sun."Why is this an insignificant claim(1 point)?

It expresses a point of view. It is not arguable. It cannot be supported. It is a significant statement.


There should be no minimum voting age.Which statement about the claim is trueA) it is defensible but not arguableB) it is both arguable and defensibleC) it is neither arguable nor defensibleD) It is arguable but not defensible?

Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.