claim
claim
claim
It is both arguable and defensible.
It's arguable. A lot of schools claim its theirs.
Facts are unarguable and proven, claims are arguable but contain evidence as well.
An arguable claim about the poem
Improving bicycle lanes would reduce road accidents
An arguable claim possesses several key qualities: it is specific and clear, allowing for a focused discussion; it presents a debatable assertion, meaning reasonable people can disagree; it is supported by evidence or reasoning that can be scrutinized; and it addresses a relevant issue or topic that invites differing perspectives. These qualities ensure that the claim can stimulate critical thinking and meaningful dialogue.
An arguable thesis is a statement that presents a clear position on an issue or topic that is open to debate or interpretation. It typically takes a stance that can be supported or refuted with evidence and reasoning. A strong arguable thesis will challenge the reader to consider different perspectives and engage in critical thinking.
It expresses a point of view. It is not arguable. It cannot be supported. It is a significant statement.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.