No, he did not die. He wouldn't be in the 6th movie.
It can hardly even be a matter of opinion in this case, Rupert Grint is a vastly superior actor than Radcliffe, it's a comparison of a person who is an actor to somebody who isn't, Daniel cannot act to save his life. For almost a decade now we've been seeing Daniel stammering on screen with his horrific monotone voice, it's like he's just reading every line off the script, hardly even appears to put any effort into it, and when he does it makes you want to rip your eardrums out, he's hardly improved the past 10 years and he never will. Rupert has always been brilliant and shows an incredible depth of emotion for somebody of his age, by Goblet of Fire he's not just acting with his voice and body, you just take one look at him and you know exactly whats going on behind those eyes, the guy is just pure talent and really has a future after Harry Potter. Radcliffe is riding his Harry Potter fame for all it's worth. He is not talented. Radcliffe should be seeing an acting coach, voice coach, take dancing and singing lessons. He obviously isn't interested in making himself better and thinks he doesn't have to.
Yes, But only in cartoon. well he dose save people in movies and other places and he really cute
She helps Roy Ebarhardt save owls with her step brother Mulletfingers
Harry Potter has a scar shaped like lighting on his forehead from the time when Voldemort's curse backfired. Daniel Radcliffe has this because he is playing the role of the character and that is very important.
The movie you are asking about is called "The Wraith" (1986).
The actor, yes. The character, no. Arthur Kipps, the lawyer that Daniel portrays, is killed trying to save his son, four-year-old Joseph Kipps, from a train. Both are hit and killed. But no worries - it's not gory.
the ones Daniel plants
he did
The cast of Save - 2007 includes: Daniel Luke Charles Montinola
It can hardly even be a matter of opinion in this case, Rupert Grint is a vastly superior actor than Radcliffe, it's a comparison of a person who is an actor to somebody who isn't, Daniel cannot act to save his life. For almost a decade now we've been seeing Daniel stammering on screen with his horrific monotone voice, it's like he's just reading every line off the script, hardly even appears to put any effort into it, and when he does it makes you want to rip your eardrums out, he's hardly improved the past 10 years and he never will. Rupert has always been brilliant and shows an incredible depth of emotion for somebody of his age, by Goblet of Fire he's not just acting with his voice and body, you just take one look at him and you know exactly whats going on behind those eyes, the guy is just pure talent and really has a future after Harry Potter. Radcliffe is riding his Harry Potter fame for all it's worth. He is not talented. Radcliffe should be seeing an acting coach, voice coach, take dancing and singing lessons. He obviously isn't interested in making himself better and thinks he doesn't have to.
It is about one of the pierres brother who has cancer,and how he wishes he could save him
FERGBREATH (save some oodles for me)
Yes she does.
No, according to the Bible, it was the angel of the Lord who shut the mouths of the lions and saved Daniel from harm in the den. There is no mention of Jesus physically entering the den in that account.
Because the singer of the band, Pierre Bouvier, had a brother with cancer and he wanted to write a song about his brother and how he wished he could save him. I think it is very sweet!
The majority of the titans, save Prometheus and his brother Epimethius.
go on the trolly and get him