Yes I know! QE2 has been complicit in Treason since 1972, and she is the worst Traitor in history - to England and the rest of the UK. She is also the first Monarch to have broken her 'Coronation Oath'!
That was when Mary Queen of Scots was beheaded. She was executed for treason because of her involvement in the Babington Plot, which wanted to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I.
No, there is no evidence, only suspicions at the time. However, it does appear that Seymour paid unhealthy attention to Elizabeth when she was around 14. It would seem that his aim was to marry Elizabeth, which he didn't achieve, but ended up being beheaded for treason.
Assuming you are talking about Queen Elizabeth I of England: There were several modes of execution: -Beheading (this was the best option for the victim) -Starvation -Boiling in oil, water or lead (for poisners) -Hanging -Pressing -Hung, drawn, and quatered (for peope who had commited an act of treason) Elizabeth did take executions seriously and didn't enjoy having peope executed.
Benedict Arnold's treason was in 1780.
To be discovered plotting against the Queen would be high treason, and this was punishable by death.
British leaders said Patrick Henry committed treason.
TREASON against the United States is a crime which can be committed outside the country for which you can be charged in the US. For other crimes committed on foreign soil, you can be charged in the US as a FUGITIVE and held pending extradition from those countries with whom we have extradition treaties.
By signing the declaration, the founding fathers were comitting treason.
Gordon Brown has many faults but he hasn't committed treason.
No, the federal government cannot be sued for treason. Treason is a criminal offense committed against the state, and only individuals can be charged with treason, not the government as a whole.
I can give you several sentences.Benedict Arnold committed treason.His acts of treason nearly destroyed the palace.You will hang for treason, sir!
treason
No. King Charles I thought it was impossible to have committed treason since he was the king. Whether he was in-fact guilty of treason is debatable.
because they could of committed treason or petty treason.
Treason
Treason.
This would be treason.