Harry Potter is not real. So, technically, NO!
Harry Potter. This was a result of a failed attempt at his life by Voldemort.
Harry's lightning scar is located on his forehead.
Harry Potter and the Philosephers Stone
It didn't. In the book said last time Harry's scar hurt was 19 years ago, when Voldemort died. In the movie, you have nothing that indicates that his scar was hurting.
There is no big significance. It is where Voldemorts curse touched him, but was unable to kill him when Harry was a baby. He was left only with the scar.
Yes.
Harry Potter. This was a result of a failed attempt at his life by Voldemort.
Harry's lightning scar is located on his forehead.
Harry Potter and the Philosephers Stone
Harry's scar is red.
No. Harry says his scar hadn't pained him for nineteen years, which he when he killed Voldemort.
No, he always has his scar. There are no goofs documented where this was missing since it's such a important part to the character of Harry Potter.
Yes, when Harry comes back to life (although he wasn't dead - he was just in an 'in between'), he still has his scar. The part of Voldemort within him was gone, but that part wasn't his scar, per say. Voldemort just used the scar to channel himself in Harry. Once Harry comes back to life, then, the scar is basically useless, but it's still there.
Dumbledore.
Yes.
It didn't. In the book said last time Harry's scar hurt was 19 years ago, when Voldemort died. In the movie, you have nothing that indicates that his scar was hurting.
It identifies him as the boy who lived.