Go here to purchase: http://www.mundania.com/books-underavelvetcloak.html
No. J.K. Rowling never said he was. Some people pretend he is though. But he wasn't.... And anyway, he doesn't have an invisibility cloak.
Harry thought it was either Professor Snape or Lord Voldemort under the cloak. It was actually Professor Quirrel and Lord Voldemort, who were sharing a body.
Both. He used it in book 3 when he spied on Minister Fudge, who was talking in the Three Broomsticks about Sirius Black's betrayal of Lily and James Potter. He used it in book 4 when spying on dragons, the first task, with Hagrid, who told Harry to wear the cloak so as not to be seen cheating. Answer Harry Potter most certainly uses the Cloak in Book 4 as it is revealed that Mad Eye Moody can see through the Cloak. In Book 3, Harry tries sneaking off to Hogsmeade under this lovely Invisibility Cloak.
According to the legend of the three brothers, Death had the invisibility cloak and gave it to the youngest of the three. Most invisibility cloaks were woven from the long, fine, silky, silvery hair of the Demiguise, an animal found with great difficulty in the Far East.
If you mean the invisibility cloak then Harry Potter, Ron Weasey and Hermione Granger use it at various points.
Under a Velvet Cloak has 228 pages.
Under a Velvet Cloak was created on 2007-12-05.
The ISBN of Under a Velvet Cloak is 978-1-59426-294-4.
Under the invisibility cloak!
A wollen cloak.
Jane of the Volturi wears clothes under her cloak in Stephenie Meyer's second book , New Moon.
1. Because she is a witch. 2. First she stunned Carow, then she came out from under the Cloak.
No. J.K. Rowling never said he was. Some people pretend he is though. But he wasn't.... And anyway, he doesn't have an invisibility cloak.
Harry thought it was either Professor Snape or Lord Voldemort under the cloak. It was actually Professor Quirrel and Lord Voldemort, who were sharing a body.
The Federation agreed not to develop or use cloaking technology, under a treaty.
There are tunnels under the water to get from one pier to the next.
No