In the story he robbed the rich to give to the poor.
I don't think he is!
I dont think so but i wish it would because i love robin hood
i think shooting arrows maybe
Well, I don't think he called Robin anything but the Jokers wife Harley calls Robin Bird Brain and she calls batgirl... bratgirl. If you have seen batman beyond in the scene "That night..." You see them call robin bird brain and batgirl, bratgirl.
Depends on which version of the tale you're talking about! I believe that Cary Elwes' portrayal of the character in 'Robin Hood: Men in Tights' showed Robin in a very good light. He was gracious to those he defeated, fought Prince John with the purest of motives, and was gracious enough to allow King Richard the honor of a wedding kiss to Marion.
Which do you think is morally wrong between the worms and viruses?
I think most people would associate Robin Hood with Richard the Lion Hearted.
Off the top of my head, I can only think of Little John (from Robin Hood) and Stuart Little (the mouse).
I think Robin robert is single.
i dunno but i think its cuz 'o' 'lil' red riding hood The older tales of Robin Hood have him dress entirely in scarlet. It use to be Will Scarlet was a name for Robin Hood until the story got elaborated and Scarlett became a separate character. It wasn't until Sir Walter Scott that Robin dressed in Lincoln green.
no. Robin Klein is a girl. I used to think Robin Klein was a boy but she isnt
I think for a girl would be Robby. I named by Robin Robby.
Non-examples of consonance include words or phrases that do not have repeated consonant sounds within them. For instance, words like "cat" or "dog" do not exhibit consonance because they do not have repeated consonant sounds. Additionally, phrases that do not have the deliberate repetition of consonant sounds, such as "the sun is bright," would also be considered non-examples of consonance. In summary, any words or phrases that lack the intentional repetition of consonant sounds do not demonstrate consonance.
A moral conflict in a book is when a character can't decide what is right to do in the situation.
According to Aristotle and most philosophers, the purpose of ethics is living well. Its central concept is the concept of the good. What is the point of theorizing about the good without becoming good?In theory, there is a fundamental division about the subject matter of ethics. Some philosophers think it is about character, about what we should be, about becoming a morally good person. Other philosophers think it is about acts, about what we should do, about doing the right thing. (A third option is to combine these two different viewpoints.)An ethics of moral character is also called a virtue ethics because it focuses on character traits. Positive character traits are virtues; negative character traits are vices. It takes the fundamental question of ethics to be: "What should I be?" In other words, "What kind of person should I be?"By way of contrast, an ethics of moral action focuses on the rightness or wrongness of acts, behavioral decisions. It takes the fundamental question of ethics to be: "What should I do?" (Most people today seem to assume that ethics is about right and wrong acts and not about good and bad character.)Therefore, a virtue ethics focuses on the ideal of developing a morally good character. Typically, those who advocate a virtue ethics take morally right actions to be what a morally good person would do in certain circumstances. In this way, they try to understand talk about right and wrong acts in terms of good and bad character. ----
Yes, a robin will ,in fact, foster another egg. I think.
Because if it is what I think you are referring to, it is morally wrong should not be done.