Because it wasn’t his fault sort of, Victor treats him unfairly and in a way that makes him violent and plain old nasty.
Actually I don't think it would have been wise for him to make a female creature. The creature told Frankenstein that if he would make him a wife, he and she would go far away from the world of men and he would never again harm a living thing. Frankenstein, as many people know, did not do this, fearing that the female might not agree with the creature's plans or that they would hate each other. This, in my opinion, would to little to change the creature's ways. Besides this, there is not telling what the female's actions would be. Also, Frankenstein thought, even if she did agree to join the creature in exile, they might reproduce, and so he destroyed the nearly completed female, setting the creature on to more murders. The solution to the reproductive problem, of course, is devastatingly simple: Frankenstein should simply have built a female without reproductive organs.
One of the themes of the book is 'Nature over Nurture' and it is illustrated rather bluntly that the monster became evil because of Dr. Frankenstein's neglect towards him. So the Dr. should have been responsible for raising the creature he created.
Frankenstein did not read the books. It was the 'monster.' But the four books were Paradise Lost, a volume of Plutarch's Lives, the Sorrows of Werter, and I guess you could consider the fourth to be Volney's Ruins of Empires. (Found in Chapter 12 & 15)
Justine Moritz should be considered innocent because she was wrongfully accused of the murder of William Frankenstein, as evidenced by her lack of motive and the presence of another potential culprit—Victor Frankenstein’s creature. Additionally, her character and loyalty to the Frankenstein family demonstrate her integrity, making it implausible for her to commit such a crime. The circumstantial evidence against her, including the locket found with her, fails to definitively link her to the act. Ultimately, her trial reflects the failures of justice rather than her guilt.
Frankenstein is addicted to knowledge in his younger years leading to his creation. The mariner is cursed by knowledge because he must enlighten people on his desolate tale such as the wedding guest. This brings up the Prometheus factor because they both went past the bounds that humans should go....Victor with the creature and the Mariner with killing the albatross.
Creating the creature a mate would have solved Frankenstein's immediate problems; however, he could potentially have destroyed humankind or set off a whole chain of events he didn't want to happen. The creature was miserable; creating a whole new race of these creatures could have been disastrous. Note: Victor Frankenstein is the creator's name; the creature is simply called "the creature" or "the monster" but is NOT called "Frankenstein."
The creature's strongly persuasive arguments (the creature expressed the loneliness of him being left out & suggested that victor should take care of his own creature:" [I] am thy creature.") made Victor unable to refuse to listen to the creature's story.
Actually I don't think it would have been wise for him to make a female creature. The creature told Frankenstein that if he would make him a wife, he and she would go far away from the world of men and he would never again harm a living thing. Frankenstein, as many people know, did not do this, fearing that the female might not agree with the creature's plans or that they would hate each other. This, in my opinion, would to little to change the creature's ways. Besides this, there is not telling what the female's actions would be. Also, Frankenstein thought, even if she did agree to join the creature in exile, they might reproduce, and so he destroyed the nearly completed female, setting the creature on to more murders. The solution to the reproductive problem, of course, is devastatingly simple: Frankenstein should simply have built a female without reproductive organs.
One of the themes of the book is 'Nature over Nurture' and it is illustrated rather bluntly that the monster became evil because of Dr. Frankenstein's neglect towards him. So the Dr. should have been responsible for raising the creature he created.
Frankenstein did not read the books. It was the 'monster.' But the four books were Paradise Lost, a volume of Plutarch's Lives, the Sorrows of Werter, and I guess you could consider the fourth to be Volney's Ruins of Empires. (Found in Chapter 12 & 15)
It, of course, depends on which movie you mean, but I'm assuming you mean the 1931 classic.In the movie the monster never speaks. In the book he has a lot to say.In the movie the monster is burned to death. In the book he leaves 'for the farthest shore.'In the movie Frankenstein's assistant, Fritz (aka Igor), gets an abnormal brian. In the book there is no Igor and no problem with the brain.In the book the doctor's younger brother is killed. In the movie there is no younger brother, only Frankenstein's father the Baron.In the book, Frankenstein's first name was Victor and his friend's name was Henry. In the movie their names are reversed.
Humans simply are not perfect and if it is the first time the husband has cheated and he is remorseful then yes, he should be forgiven, but marriage counseling is a must along with the husband having to earn that bond of trust back with his spouse. If the husband is a continuous cheater then no, he should not be forgiven.
Justine Moritz should be considered innocent because she was wrongfully accused of the murder of William Frankenstein, as evidenced by her lack of motive and the presence of another potential culprit—Victor Frankenstein’s creature. Additionally, her character and loyalty to the Frankenstein family demonstrate her integrity, making it implausible for her to commit such a crime. The circumstantial evidence against her, including the locket found with her, fails to definitively link her to the act. Ultimately, her trial reflects the failures of justice rather than her guilt.
Frankenstein is addicted to knowledge in his younger years leading to his creation. The mariner is cursed by knowledge because he must enlighten people on his desolate tale such as the wedding guest. This brings up the Prometheus factor because they both went past the bounds that humans should go....Victor with the creature and the Mariner with killing the albatross.
Victor Frankenstein, having created the creature, should have tried to school him and educate him. It would have be highly difficult to have a good outcome. The creature was very ugly, and was created in a horrible way. Of course, as a man, the creature would want a mate and what sort of woman would want to have anything to do with him. Victor should have been the type of father that had the intelligence to see that could no good could come out of trying to play God and give life to a being he had made from his own two hands.
I believe people make mistakes which should be forgiven. But some things are not meant to be forgiven such as murder or child abuse.
You should remember how majestic this creature can be.