A horcrux is not real (created by J. K Rowling for the widely successful Harry Potter series). There are, however, many tales in legend of sorcerers trapping their souls.
In undead games, liches live after death by trapping their soul in an object.
In the Harry Potter storyline, killing an animal would not work.
No, it is not... sorry guy.
It said that the real Horcrux had been stolen and that it was the writer's intention to destroy it so that when Voldemort meets his match he will be mortal once more. It was signed "R.A.B." (Regulus Arcturus Black).
Not in real life.
he doesn't die but the Horcrux Voldemort creates in Harry dies when Voldemort applies the killing curse on him. To summarize: Daniel Radcliffe is a real person, he is not dead, and now. Harry Potter is a fictional person, he is not dead, and now.
It depends on the horcrux, are you talking about the one inside the Resurrection stone or harry himself. There is also nagini the real locket. You have to be specific
No, it is not... sorry guy.
your kidding right...
It said that the real Horcrux had been stolen and that it was the writer's intention to destroy it so that when Voldemort meets his match he will be mortal once more. It was signed "R.A.B." (Regulus Arcturus Black).
No, Regulus Black did.
When harry dies he comes back to life after talking to Dumbledore. Dumbledore told him to get on the train or go back to real life. Harry returns to the real world The curse killed the horcrux in Harry, not him.
It is not possible to create a real ghost as ghosts are considered to be supernatural entities that are not scientifically proven to exist.
In real life you can`t no scope and get a kill. It would be 1 out of 1000 to get a no scope in real life.
no you cant
Yes.
In real life-no.
She gave seven years of support to the hero and eventually destroyed a Horcrux. But in the end, only Harry did the real work (sacrificing his life).
you are a looser