Sub sola nihil novi este

Answer 1

I believe the quotation to be somehow inaccurate, in my opinion, and unless textual reference provided, the sentence in Latin shoul read: Sub sole nihil novi este. That is translated literally as: there is nothing of new under the sun, rephraseable as There is nothing new under the sun. Sola, as quoted, comes from Latin solus-a-um, which is an adjective lacking a head or noun, therefore the substantial reference being absent or omitted makes the translation implausible. I tend to think the word is, or rather should be, sole; from sol-solis=sun.