No. Daniel 1:6 explicitly states that he was of the Tribe of Judah, not a Levite. See also:
Though The Bible or even Jewish tradition does not tell us wither or not Daniel was a Levite (of the tribe of Levi, one of Jacob/Israel's twelve sons). It is likely that he was of the tribe of Judea, since they were the tribe which the kings descended from. And in Babylon that was sort of Daniel role, a leader and ruler.
No. The Bible specifically states that he is of the Tribe of Ephraim. This is made clear in both Numbers 13:8 and 1 Chronicles 7:20, 27.
John the Baptist was a levitical Priest. It was conferred by his family. Levitical priests (see Aaron) have baptismal authority.
Joshua is an Old Testament patriarch and usually not accorded the title of saint. He was not a priest, brother or nun.
Joshua's Tomb in the Samaria village of Timnat Heres, Israel.
no
The first Kohen Gadol (High Priest) was Aaron, brother of Moses. The second was Aaron's son Elazar (Numbers ch.21), contemporary of Joshua.
Certainly, how else do you expect them to eat, pay rent, medical expenses, etc. God established 'tithes' for the Levitical Priesthood and the same is for His Church of God ministry.
No. He was priest and king of Salem, a city identified with Jerusalem. Hebrews 5-7 refers to Jesus' eternal priesthood as being of the "order of Melchizedek" as opposed to Levitical in nature, citing Ps. 110:4.
The first priest was Melchizedek.Roman Catholic AnswerUnder the original covenant, the head of every family was a priest. Later, when things went awry with the golden calf at Sinai, another covenant was given and the priesthood was taken away from the family and given to Aaron. This is referred to as the Levitical Priesthood. The first priest that we meet in the Old Testament is, indeed, Melchizedek, a mysterious figure who offered bread and wine. He was not a Jew.Under the New Covenant (of Jesus Christ), Jesus is the First, Last, and greatest priest of the new law.
The Levitical Book.
Ancient tradition has it that the book was written by Joshua himself, completed after his death by Eleazar the high priest and his son Phinehas. Joshua contains vivid material, written in the first person, suggesting that the author was an eyewitness.
The name Jesus is the Greek form of 'Joshua', but the Greek form is only used in the Bible when referring to Jesus Christ. Joshua is one of the most common names in the entire Bible, but always as a great leader or high priest. Of course, we have Joshua, son of Nun, who is reported to have conquered the Canaanites. There were also Joshua the Bet-Shemite and Joshua, governor of the city of Jericho (2 Kings chapter 23). Later, Zechariah had apocalyptic visions, in which Joshua the high priest had been found guilty of iniquity, but the Lord needed Joshua and was willing to offer him inducements and honour. Interestlingly, the Bible says that the high priest Joshua, son of Jozadak or Josedec (Joseph), assisted Zorobabel in rebuilding the Temple following the Return from Exile of the Jews. In the list of Israelites that returned from the Babylonian Exile, Ezra also records that a Joshua was head of the priestly family of Phahath Moab, while another was head of the priestly family of Idaia, or Jedaia. This is an improbably high proportion of heads of priestly families who were called Joshua, yet no other person listed, not even anyone's father, was called Joshua. Either the name Joshua was quite common at the time of the Return, or it was not, and there could be statistical evidence in the Bible that the name Joshua (Jesus) already had important religious associations.
Joshua 4Another possibility:Depending upon exactly what you mean by the question, your answer might be found in Exodus 28:17-20.