What are the disadvantages of harrold hardrada?

Answer 1

Answer

The bad things about Harald Hardrada are that he is not related to Edwaqrd the Confessor his brother died, he was baten by England, He just conquered then was killed, he was so greedy for power he got killed for it and that he is a Viking.

sorry i can only think of seven!

Answer 2

Harald Hardrada, also known as Harald III of Norway, faced several disadvantages during his reign and military campaigns. These included facing strong opposition from other Scandinavian rulers, such as Sweyn II of Denmark, and internal conflicts within Norway. Additionally, his invasion of England in 1066 ultimately led to his defeat and death at the Battle of Stamford Bridge, highlighting the risks and challenges of his ambitious military endeavors.

Answer 3

Oh, dude, like, Harrold Hardrada? Yeah, well, the dude was like super ambitious and stuff, but he kinda got wrecked at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066, so that was a bummer. Plus, like, he had to deal with all those pesky Anglo-Saxons and Normans, so it was like a total headache for him. But hey, that's just how the Viking longship sails sometimes, you know?

Answer 4

Well, let's focus on the positives here! Harrold Hardrada was a skilled warrior and leader, known for his bravery and military tactics. While everyone has their flaws, it's important to remember the good qualities of historical figures too. Let's paint a happy little picture and appreciate the strengths Harrold Hardrada brought to the world.