yes
because the story of frankenstein was a very insprational story which explains the stages of artificially creating life and the outcome. frankenstein is an example of a sceientist who wanted to be very popular and tried to achieve this by artificially creating life 'frankensteins monster'. the author of this book tried to show her feelings about the scientific advances of that day and i believe she was clearly not happy with the advances and tried to portray that through this book by making frankenstein seem like the bad guy by making the frankenstein created creature reak havoc and destroy the city. the character frankenstein has alot of meaning and history behind him and that is why he is such an iconic character.
To make a creature so blissful... but that obviously doesnt work out and he is left with what he considers a monster.
Dr. Frankenstein was a chemist and an anatomist. He did not study literature. Keep in mind, however, that we are talking about a fictional character.
burn himself
No. Dr. Frankenstein is a fictional character, as is the monster he created.
He wasn't Frankenstein was a character in a book, Frankenstein's Monster by Mary Shelley.
Karl Frankenstein died in 1990.
he is very awesome, excellent
Frankenstein was the main character; the man who created the monster. The other title of the book is The Modern Prometheus.
No, he is a fictional character. Thank God.
Frodo Baggins Frankenstein
yes
he killed her
Frankenstein. His first name is Victor. Doctor Victor von Frankenstein is the creator of the monster. The monster has no name except 'monster'.
You have a reality crisis here. Mary Shelley was a real person, she wrote the novel Frankenstein. Frankenstein is a fictional character. They never met, never eloped.
The literary term for Mr. Waldman would be a character or a minor character in Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein". He is a professor of chemistry who influences Victor Frankenstein's scientific pursuits.