energy
Due to a bit of an oversight when Rainbow Neos was translated into English, you cannot use a Fusion Substitute in the place of Rainbow Dragon or Rainbow Dark Dragon, nor can Elemental Hero Prisma take the place of one either. The reason is, the Japanese version says it is made from "Elemental Hero Neos" and an 'Ultimate Gem Lord monster'. This wording is actually non-specific, it is not naming anything specifically, just looks for any monster with Ultimate Gem Lord in the name. You therefore can't use a substitute or Prisma in conjunction with that second component, only Elemental Hero Neos. When they translated the card into English, they just wrote Rainbow Dragon and Rainbow Dark Dragon by name, not realising it changes the way the card is played - but the card has to follow its original Japanese text, and that is how it is ruled at tournaments. So King of the Swamp can be used, but only in place of Elemental Hero Neos.
1. Ultimate Humongousaur2. Ultimate Swampfire3. Ultimate Spidermonkey4. Ultimate Big Chill5. Ultimate Echo Echo6. Ultimate Cannonbolt7. NRG8. Ampfibian9. Armadrillo10. Water Hazard11. Nanomech
Ultimate Disney was created in 2001.
Ultimate Wolverine was created in 2001.
Proximate analysis determines the moisture, ash, volatile matter, and fixed carbon content of a substance, while ultimate analysis determines the elemental composition (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen) of a substance. Proximate analysis provides information on the physical and chemical properties, while ultimate analysis provides information on the elemental composition.
To convert proximate analysis of coal to ultimate analysis, use the Dulong formula as follows: Carbon = 0.75*(fixed carbon + [volatile matter/100]); Hydrogen = 0.06volatile matter; Oxygen = [moisture/100] + 0.3sulfur - carbon - hydrogen; Nitrogen = volatile matter/100 * 0.01. This formula estimates the ultimate analysis (C, H, O, N) from the proximate analysis (moisture, volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash).
Proximate analysis of food refers to the determination of its major components, such as moisture, ash, protein, fat, and carbohydrates, providing a snapshot of the nutritional content. Ultimate analysis, on the other hand, examines the elemental composition of food, identifying the specific amounts of elements like carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen. Together, these analyses help in understanding both the nutritional value and the chemical makeup of food products.
Proximate analysis of oil provides information on its moisture, volatile matter, fixed carbon, and ash content, helping determine its heating value and combustion characteristics. Ultimate analysis of oil gives the elemental composition in terms of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen content, offering insights into its chemical composition and potential environmental impacts when burned.
It is proximate.
The "ultimate" analysis" gives the composition of the biomass in wt% of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen (the major components) as well as sulfur and nitrogen (if any). The carbon determination includes that present in the organic coal substance and any originally present as mineral carbonate. The hydrogen determination includes that in the organic materials in coal and in all water associated with the coal. All nitrogen determined is assumed to be part of the organic materials in coal. The "proximate" analysis gives moisture content, volatile content,consisting of gases and vapors driven off during pyrolysis (when heated to 950 C), the fixed carbon and the ash,the inorganic residue remaining after combustion in the sample and the high heating value (HHV) based on the complete combustion of the sample to carbon dioxide and liquid water. Proximate analysis is the most often used analysis for characterizing coals in connection with their utilization.
Proximate questions focus on the immediate causes and mechanisms of behavior, such as genetic, physiological, or environmental influences. Ultimate questions, on the other hand, are concerned with the evolutionary reasons behind behavior, such as how it has contributed to reproductive success or survival over time.
Proximate causes refer to immediate triggers or mechanisms that directly lead to a particular outcome. Ultimate causes, on the other hand, delve deeper into the evolutionary or historical reasons behind why a trait or behavior exists. Ultimate causes are about understanding the broader context and long-term implications, while proximate causes focus more on the immediate factors at play.
The proximate hypothesis refers to explanations that focus on the immediate, underlying mechanisms or causes of a phenomenon. In biological contexts, it often addresses how behaviors, traits, or processes occur based on genetic, physiological, and environmental factors. This contrasts with ultimate hypotheses, which seek to explain the evolutionary reasons behind a trait or behavior. Essentially, proximate hypotheses answer "how" something happens, while ultimate hypotheses address "why" it has evolved.
energy
Every behavior is due to some kind of external stimulus that triggers the behavior. This behavior emerges due to the fact that it has proven to increase fitness. The evolutionary cause behind the behavior, however, is called the ultimate cause. The proximate cause is what is immediately observed as causing the behavior. For example, birds will reproduce only at a certain time (behavior). This can be attributed to the declining sunlight received by the bird's photoreceptors (proximate cause). Or when movement is detected with the photoreceptors (proximate cause), and the reciprocated behavior in most animals is the flinch reaction (behavior).
There will be difference in value of fixed carbon and carbon in ultimate analysis as some carbon is lost in hydrocarbons in volatile matter. Fixed carbon is arrived by substracting the volatile matter. Utimate analysis ditermines the total carbon content which includes the carbon present in volatile matter. Fixed carbon is useful to know how much coke can be generated out of coking coal.