he was found not giilty he is a water boy for USC
In legal trials the defendent is the person accused, the prosecution has to prove the charges against the defendent. In civil court such as OJ Simpson's wrongful death trial he was the claiment and the plantiff was the Brown and Goldman families.
in the 1994 murder case of OJ Simpson
I am answering this question with the assumption that it is the murder trials you are asking about. No, the fifth amendment was not violated in these cases. The first trial was a criminal trial in which OJ was acquitted (found not guilty) of the murder charges. The second trial was a civil trial in which the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman sued OJ for wrongful death and battery. OJ was unanimously found guilty of wrongful death and battery against Ronald Goldman and battery against Nicole Brown Simpson. He was ordered to pay 33,500,000.00 in damages.
No but she did commentary on the national news during the trial.
It depends which OJ Simpson case you're referring to, his murder trial, his civil wrongful death case, or his kidnapping/armed robbery case. His aquittal for the murder trial stunned and shocked the white community and proved that justice is colorblind after all. The color of money, not skin. The civil trial was a measure of justice for the Brown and Goldman families, and to a smaller degree, Dective Mark Furman. And with his last trial, the kidnapping/armed robbery trial, the community can sleep a little easier knowing Simpson is behind bars for a while.
Witnesses may (or may not) provide additional evidence relative to the outcome of the case. The legal team on both sides have the right to question any witnesses - to enhance the case for - or against the accused.
In legal trials the defendent is the person accused, the prosecution has to prove the charges against the defendent. In civil court such as OJ Simpson's wrongful death trial he was the claiment and the plantiff was the Brown and Goldman families.
Yes. An attorney can withdraw their services at their discretion. If however it creates a significant problem or if some way prejudices the outcome of the case,legal remedies can be pursued. Such as a civil suit against the attorney for damages and restitution of any money that was paid.
Criminal case
No. Retaining legal counsel would not change the outcome. Either you were insured or you were not.
The 1898 Williams v Mississippi case ended with an indicted against Williams for murder. Williams took his case to the Supreme Court but it was unanimously rejected.
in the 1994 murder case of OJ Simpson
An 'interested' witness is one who has some kind of material stake in the outcome of the case and may not necessarily be an un-biased witness.
Not enough information to reply. What kind of complaint? Against who? Does this involve a court case? Are youunhappy with the outcome?
It means that for some legal reason the court has dismissed the charges against the individual. A case may be dismissed "with prejudice" or "without prejudice."
A legal decision that is rendered against you means you lost some legal case, either in whole or in part. That could mean a money judgment was entered against you, or you were found guilty of a criminal or "quasi-criminal" prosecution.
What was the outcome of alistair ramsay court case in dundee