0
What else can I help you with?
The three most commonly used parts of the toulmin model of an argument?
The three most commonly used parts of the Toulmin model of argument are the claim, evidence, and warrant. The claim is the main point or assertion being made, while the evidence provides supporting data or facts to back up the claim. The warrant explains the reasoning or logic that connects the evidence to the claim, illustrating why the evidence supports the assertion. Together, these elements create a structured approach to building a compelling argument.
How are sam Wilson and the cartoon character alike?
because they made Sam Wilson into a cartoon called Uncle Sam
Is Mary Wilson still living?
She is still performing but has made no new records.
What comment did Henry make that caused Wilson to storm off?
Henry made a dismissive comment about Wilson's abilities or contributions, which Wilson found disrespectful and undermining. This remark struck a nerve, leading Wilson to feel insulted and prompting him to storm off in frustration. The situation highlighted underlying tensions between the two characters.
What did Percy make the gods swear on the river styx?
That they would claim their demigod children. They had many unclaimed children, often because they were too busy to claim them. Percy Jackson wanted that to end, instead of becoming a god, he wanted the gods to claim their kids. He made them swear that they'd do it.
Why does Zinn claim that Woodrow Wilson made a flimsy argument?
Howard Zinn claims that Woodrow Wilson made a flimsy argument primarily because Wilson's rationale for entering World War I—promoting democracy and peace—was undermined by the reality of U.S. imperial interests and economic motivations. Zinn points out that Wilson's idealism often masked the more self-serving agendas of the U.S. government. This contradiction highlights the disparity between the professed goals of democracy and the actual conduct of U.S. foreign policy during that era.
What kind of argument is made in a claim of value?
An argument that debates whether or not something is right or wrong
What is the difference between a claim and an argument?
A claim is a statement that asserts a belief or position, while an argument is a set of reasons presented in support of that claim. In other words, a claim is the main point being made, and an argument provides the rationale or evidence to persuade others of the validity of that claim.
What is the basic structure of an argument?
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
What is the objective claim being made in this argument?
The objective claim being made in this argument is the main point or assertion that is based on facts, evidence, or logical reasoning, rather than personal opinions or emotions.
What is the thesis of a research essay?
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
What is a Oppositional Argument?
An oppositional argument is a position taken by one party that directly opposes or refutes a specific claim or argument made by another party. It aims to present counterpoints or different perspectives in response to the original argument.
What are the rungs of the ladder made of?
Flimsy plastic
In evaluating an argument an important first step is to?
Identify the main claim or conclusion being made in the argument. This helps to understand the overall point being argued.
What does opposing claim mean?
An opposing claim is a statement or argument that contradicts or challenges another claim that has been made. It presents a different perspective or viewpoint on a particular issue or topic, often to engage in debate or discussion.
This is the most common of all mistakes in reasoning This fallacy is based on the confusion between the qualities of the person making a claim in the qualities of the claim itself?
This is known as the ad hominem fallacy, where an argument attacks the person making the claim instead of addressing the actual argument being made. It disregards the validity of the argument by focusing on irrelevant personal characteristics or actions of the individual. It is important to critique the argument itself rather than attacking the person presenting it.
What does reassertion claim type mean?
Reassertion claim type involves restating a previously made claim in a different way or providing additional evidence to support the original claim. This approach helps to reinforce the argument by emphasizing key points or strengthening the evidence.
