The cast of The Strange Case of the Irish Crown Jewels - 2003 includes: Queen Alexandra as herself Paul Begg as himself John Cafferky as himself Michael Daniel Murphy as himself Owen Dudley Edwards as himself Myles Dungan as himself King Edward VII as himself Peter Galloway as himself Kevin Hannafin as himself Michael McElhatton as Narrator Colm Toibin as himself Vivian Waugh as himself Kaiser Wilhelm II as himself Thomas Woodcock as himself
The cast of Case Unclosed - 2008 includes: Arnold Clavio as Himself - Host Kara David as Herself - Host Ivan Mayrina as Himself - Guest Host Rhea Santos as Herself - Guest Host
Tommy LeNoir has: Played himself in "Cold Case Files" in 1999. Played himself in "Autopsy 6: Secrets of the Dead" in 1999. Played himself in "Forensic Files" in 2000. Played himself in "Casino Cinema" in 2004. Played Himself - Host in "Murder" in 2007.
Judge Ferguson could legally justify making this distinction by citing relevant legal precedents or statutes that outline the criteria for different classifications. He might argue that the specific context or circumstances of the case necessitate a different legal treatment to ensure fairness or uphold constitutional rights. Additionally, he could reference principles of judicial interpretation that allow for flexibility in applying the law to achieve just outcomes. Ultimately, the justification would hinge on a careful balance of legal principles and the facts of the case.
The cast of The Case of the Courtroom Legend - 1989 includes: Raymond Burr as himself Barbara Hale as herself Alexandra Paul as herself
He files a motion for an order to have the Judge recuse himself from the case.
Recuse is what a judge does when he or she excuses himself or herself from hearing a case based on reasons that might prevent the judge from ruling impartially or just appear like he or she is ruling impartially. For example if a case involved a relative in some way, the judge should recuse himself or herself from hearing the case.
Yes. But normally such a judge, if he remembers you, will recuse himself from the case. The judge that signs a search warrant will not necessarily be the judge that tries you.
Recuse... judge is asked to step down due to conflict or other reasons.
A Judge who believes that he is biased should recuse themselves. If the Judge believes that he can fairly adjudicate the case, then he can; but most would not simply to avoid any appearance of prejudice.
You can always ask for anything you like. Changing judges is legally known as recusal. The judge will recuse him or herself if there is some legal reason necessitating it. You would need to file a motion to recuse and state what reasons you believe the judge should not hear your case.
Recuse is a legal term used when a person disqualifies oneself (as a judge) in a legal case due to a potential prejudice or partiality. Example: The judge recused himself from that case, citing a possible conflict of interest.Excuse is to release a person from an obligation or duty. Example: The gentleman is excused from jury duty as his serving would cause a hardship for his family.
To initiate a motion to recuse a judge from hearing a case, a party must typically file a written motion stating the reasons for the recusal request. This motion should be supported by specific facts or evidence showing bias or conflict of interest on the part of the judge. The decision to recuse the judge ultimately lies with the judge themselves or with a higher court if the judge refuses to recuse.
You, or your attorney, should file a motion for the judge to recuse himself from your case. You should accompany your request with some hard facts and reasoning that makes you believe the judge could not render a fair opinion in your case.
Generally, the simple answer to your question would be yes. The slightly more complicated answer is that judges are commonly required to disclose any prior connection with one of the parties, or any other potential factor that might affect the judges ability to impartially preside over a case, and then offer to recuse themselves. Ordinarily, parties can agree to waive any basis upon which a judge would ordinarily recuse himself or herself. The specific law regarding requirements for when a judge must recuse him or herself are not universal, but vary according to the particular jurisdiction.
Absolutely not; that would be a conflict of interest and a breach of ethics that would not be permitted by the courts. If the case ever reached the US Supreme Court on appeal, and the the justice was, for some reason, still a member of the Court, he (or she) would be expected to recuse himself from participating in the case.
It is generally frowned upon for a judge to preside over a case involving a family member due to the potential conflict of interest. If such a situation were to arise, the judge would likely need to recuse themselves from the case and have another judge handle it.