hypothesis
Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis
An explanation for observations based on reasoning from what you already know is often referred to as a hypothesis. It involves using existing knowledge and logical reasoning to interpret data or phenomena, allowing us to make predictions or understand underlying mechanisms. This process is fundamental in scientific inquiry, where observations lead to questions that are addressed through research and experimentation. Essentially, it's a way to connect the dots between known facts and new observations to derive meaningful conclusions.
Actually never, a theory is always in danger of being replaced by a better explanation. This does not invalidate the theory, it just means it was not as comprehensive and explanation of observations as was thought. An example of this is Newtons laws of gravity, they are still usable but we now know that Einstein's space/time bending by the mass of an object is a more comprehensive explanation.
Explanation is where you KNOW the topic and you can explain it. Predicting is where you want to know what will happen in the future.
In order for a scientist to solve a problem or learn more about a phenomenon, they must first see it in order to know that it exists. Also, observations allow scientists to make educated guesses, called hypotheses, to try and explain what is causing a phenomenon.
A prediction
Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis
An explanation for observations based on reasoning from what you already know is often referred to as a hypothesis. It involves using existing knowledge and logical reasoning to interpret data or phenomena, allowing us to make predictions or understand underlying mechanisms. This process is fundamental in scientific inquiry, where observations lead to questions that are addressed through research and experimentation. Essentially, it's a way to connect the dots between known facts and new observations to derive meaningful conclusions.
Actually never, a theory is always in danger of being replaced by a better explanation. This does not invalidate the theory, it just means it was not as comprehensive and explanation of observations as was thought. An example of this is Newtons laws of gravity, they are still usable but we now know that Einstein's space/time bending by the mass of an object is a more comprehensive explanation.
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
Intelligence analysis is the explanation of where the intelligence is trained to know the truth.
Explanation is where you KNOW the topic and you can explain it. Predicting is where you want to know what will happen in the future.
Intelligence analysis is the explanation of a situation where the intellect is trained to know the truth.
scientific explanation is....... wait why am i answering this... i dont know is the answer...
By observations and detailed examination.
It is a well-established, well-tested, well-supported, comprehensive model for the explanation of a well-defined set of observations in various branches of science. That is the definition of what a scientific theory must be, and thus evolutionary theory is a scientific theory.
NOT THE ANSWERSorry, I didn't know how to put a subquestion. This is a part of a lab I am doing. What am I being asked to anwser?Did any of the sediments remain in suspension? If so, which one? Were these results consistent with your observations of each sediment sample alone?