hypothesis
Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis
An explanation for observations based on reasoning from what you already know is often referred to as a hypothesis. It involves using existing knowledge and logical reasoning to interpret data or phenomena, allowing us to make predictions or understand underlying mechanisms. This process is fundamental in scientific inquiry, where observations lead to questions that are addressed through research and experimentation. Essentially, it's a way to connect the dots between known facts and new observations to derive meaningful conclusions.
Actually never, a theory is always in danger of being replaced by a better explanation. This does not invalidate the theory, it just means it was not as comprehensive and explanation of observations as was thought. An example of this is Newtons laws of gravity, they are still usable but we now know that Einstein's space/time bending by the mass of an object is a more comprehensive explanation.
Explanation is where you KNOW the topic and you can explain it. Predicting is where you want to know what will happen in the future.
Interpreting observations based on reasoning from what you already know is called inference. Inference involves drawing conclusions or making predictions based on existing knowledge and evidence. It allows individuals to make sense of new information by connecting it to prior experiences or established facts. This cognitive process is essential in scientific reasoning and critical thinking.
A prediction
Hypothesis.An inference.Hypothesis
An explanation for observations based on reasoning from what you already know is often referred to as a hypothesis. It involves using existing knowledge and logical reasoning to interpret data or phenomena, allowing us to make predictions or understand underlying mechanisms. This process is fundamental in scientific inquiry, where observations lead to questions that are addressed through research and experimentation. Essentially, it's a way to connect the dots between known facts and new observations to derive meaningful conclusions.
Actually never, a theory is always in danger of being replaced by a better explanation. This does not invalidate the theory, it just means it was not as comprehensive and explanation of observations as was thought. An example of this is Newtons laws of gravity, they are still usable but we now know that Einstein's space/time bending by the mass of an object is a more comprehensive explanation.
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
Intelligence analysis is the explanation of where the intelligence is trained to know the truth.
Explanation is where you KNOW the topic and you can explain it. Predicting is where you want to know what will happen in the future.
Intelligence analysis is the explanation of a situation where the intellect is trained to know the truth.
scientific explanation is....... wait why am i answering this... i dont know is the answer...
Interpreting observations based on reasoning from what you already know is called inference. Inference involves drawing conclusions or making predictions based on existing knowledge and evidence. It allows individuals to make sense of new information by connecting it to prior experiences or established facts. This cognitive process is essential in scientific reasoning and critical thinking.
It is a well-established, well-tested, well-supported, comprehensive model for the explanation of a well-defined set of observations in various branches of science. That is the definition of what a scientific theory must be, and thus evolutionary theory is a scientific theory.
By observations and detailed examination.