0
What else can I help you with?
Why might scientists repeat a study under slightly different circumstances than the original?
The original conditions may not have been conducent to good results, for example, scientists testing heat transfer and didn't use a completely closed environment in their experiment may have the conditions changed by other scientists who are peer-reviewing the experiment. They may also change it to see how the change alters the results
Why do scientists do research before they start an experiment?
Scientists conduct research before beginning an experiment to understand existing knowledge and theories related to their topic, which helps them formulate hypotheses and design effective experiments. This background research allows them to identify gaps in current understanding, avoid duplicating previous work, and refine their methodologies. Additionally, reviewing relevant literature enables scientists to anticipate potential challenges and improve the reliability and validity of their findings.
What is a conclusion in a science experiment?
A Conclusion is the opinion formed after reviewing the evidence of your experiment. Conclusion also means the results of your hypothesis. ex: My hypothesis is most people drive a mini van than a jeep. My conclusion is most people drive a jeep than a mini van. so it's kind of the answer to your hypothesis but not all the way through though.
How does one form form a scientific hypothesis?
by reviewing whats is already known
What should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion?
Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?
A science researcher is reviewing another scientists experiment and conclusion. the reviewer would most likely consider the experiment invalid if?
it contains conclusions not explained by the evidence given
Why might scientists repeat a study under slightly different circumstances than the original?
The original conditions may not have been conducent to good results, for example, scientists testing heat transfer and didn't use a completely closed environment in their experiment may have the conditions changed by other scientists who are peer-reviewing the experiment. They may also change it to see how the change alters the results
Why do scientists do research before they start an experiment?
Scientists conduct research before beginning an experiment to understand existing knowledge and theories related to their topic, which helps them formulate hypotheses and design effective experiments. This background research allows them to identify gaps in current understanding, avoid duplicating previous work, and refine their methodologies. Additionally, reviewing relevant literature enables scientists to anticipate potential challenges and improve the reliability and validity of their findings.
What is a conclusion in a science experiment?
A Conclusion is the opinion formed after reviewing the evidence of your experiment. Conclusion also means the results of your hypothesis. ex: My hypothesis is most people drive a mini van than a jeep. My conclusion is most people drive a jeep than a mini van. so it's kind of the answer to your hypothesis but not all the way through though.
How does one form form a scientific hypothesis?
by reviewing whats is already known
What is the process for which scientists grade another scientist work before it can be published?
The general term for this is not "grading" but "peer review."
How do you come up with a conclusion?
A conclusion is typically reached by reviewing all the evidence, facts, and arguments presented during an investigation or discussion. It involves synthesizing this information to form a final decision or opinion based on the available data. It is important to consider all perspectives and weigh the relevant factors before drawing a conclusion.
What should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion?
Is the information your reviewing provided or your own? Does the appearance support the hypothesis or the evidence? Ever heard of devils advocat?
When analyzing data what does scientists look for?
When reviewing experimental data, scientists look for results that either support or disprove their theories. Additionally, they may seek patterns of results that either match previous results or that suggest another reason for the results.
What is the process called that use to check each other's work?
Through peer review
What is the Practice in which a scientist's work is looked at by a other scientists before it is published?
it is basically called as reviewing the paper from the peer members so called for checking the originality ,impact,etc. -datta v
Who is responsible for reviewing and closing cases?
The A/BO is responsible for reviewing and closing cases.
