A scientific hypothesis that is extensively tested and consistently supports its predictions may be referred to as a scientific theory. This term indicates that the hypothesis has gained substantial empirical support and is widely accepted within the scientific community. Unlike a hypothesis, which is a preliminary explanation, a theory provides a broader understanding of a phenomenon based on accumulated evidence.
The next step in the scientific method, after formulating a hypothesis, is to conduct experiments to test that hypothesis. This involves designing experiments, collecting data, and analyzing the results to determine if they support or contradict the hypothesis. Based on the findings, scientists may refine their hypothesis or develop new ones, leading to further experimentation and investigation. This iterative process continues until a robust conclusion is drawn.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
When the results of experimentation support a particular hypothesis, researchers typically conduct further experiments to validate and strengthen their findings. This may involve replicating the experiment under different conditions or with varied samples to ensure consistency and reliability. If the hypothesis continues to be supported, it may contribute to the development of a theory or broader understanding within the field. Finally, researchers may share their results through publications or presentations to inform the scientific community and invite further inquiry.
It is accepted by the scientific community as a law when it has been tested in sufficiently various ways by sufficiently many people and has not been disproved. Or, more simply, it's not AN observation that becomes a law, it's MANY observations. When an experiment can be done by anyone, anywhere, at any time, and the same result is achieved this suggests that that is the only result attainable from the experiment. Strictly speaking this doesn't constitute a proof, just a failure to disprove, but if the theory continues to be not disproved then it is accepted.
well i beleive it ended 13000 at earlseraasd
The next step in the scientific method, after formulating a hypothesis, is to conduct experiments to test that hypothesis. This involves designing experiments, collecting data, and analyzing the results to determine if they support or contradict the hypothesis. Based on the findings, scientists may refine their hypothesis or develop new ones, leading to further experimentation and investigation. This iterative process continues until a robust conclusion is drawn.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
A testable statement used for making predictions and carrying out further experiments is called a hypothesis. The hypothesis might change as the scientist continues to test his or her theory.
When the results of experimentation support a particular hypothesis, researchers typically conduct further experiments to validate and strengthen their findings. This may involve replicating the experiment under different conditions or with varied samples to ensure consistency and reliability. If the hypothesis continues to be supported, it may contribute to the development of a theory or broader understanding within the field. Finally, researchers may share their results through publications or presentations to inform the scientific community and invite further inquiry.
It is accepted by the scientific community as a law when it has been tested in sufficiently various ways by sufficiently many people and has not been disproved. Or, more simply, it's not AN observation that becomes a law, it's MANY observations. When an experiment can be done by anyone, anywhere, at any time, and the same result is achieved this suggests that that is the only result attainable from the experiment. Strictly speaking this doesn't constitute a proof, just a failure to disprove, but if the theory continues to be not disproved then it is accepted.
As the universe continues to expand at an accelerating rate, space-time is expected to remain flat according to current scientific theories.
Phase 1- Observation and question- ConjecturesPhase 2- Hypothesis- Prediction- ExperimentationPhase 3- Peer reviewObservation, Question and ConjectureThe first phase represents the transit of the real and physical into the sphere of intellect.It is said that when Isaac Newton observed an apple falling, it led him to question what mechanism was at work. This in turn led him to consider various conjectures and to conduct an examination of the ideas of other researchers from across the world, both contemporaneous and past. From the numerous conjectures he was able to distil and select the most likely explanation for his observation.This is the way in which scientific advance proceeds. First an observation is made, then a careful consideration of what has been observed and the distillation of a plausible explanation.Hypothesis, Prediction and ExperimentationThe second phase represents the return from the sphere of intellect into the real and physical.The distillation of ideas results in a hypothesis, which in the case of Newton's gravitational theory was a mathematical model of objects falling under the influence of gravity.In order for a hypothesis to bear scrutiny, it must be able to accurately predict what will happen under a given set of circumstances. These predictions must then be checked by careful experimentation. When prediction and experiment reach the same conclusion, the hypothesis is borne out; when they do not the hypothesis must be revised to accommodate the findings of the experiment The process of experiment and refinement continues until the predictions concur with the experiment or it becomes clear that they do not. Once concurrence has been achieved, the researcher is ready to proceed to the final phase. Otherwise the hypothesis must be abandoned and the researcher may choose to return to phase 1.Peer ReviewThe final phase is the transit of the hypothesis into the broad circulation of scientific ideas.It begins with the publication of the observation, the hypothesis and the experimental methods and results. At this stage other experimenters will attempt to reproduce the findings. This process may equally result in the revision or abandonment of the hypothesis. If the bulk of the experimenters are in agreement on the hypothesis, it is accepted into scientific literature as a finding. After a certain period of time and repeated experimentation a hypothesis may be promoted to the status of a Law. If they are not in agreement the hypothesis may be abandoned.
characteristics of a good researchEmpiricalLogicalCyclicalAnalyticalReplicabilityCritical~i hope it would help ;))
well i beleive it ended 13000 at earlseraasd
Some disadvantages of Windows Server 2003 are its age, reduced compatibility, and cost. Despite being over 10 years old, it continues to be used extensively.
Evolution is a scientific theory because it provides a well-supported explanation for the diversity of life on Earth based on observable evidence from fields like biology, genetics, geology, and paleontology. The theory of evolution has been tested and confirmed through numerous scientific studies and continues to be refined as new evidence emerges. In scientific terms, a theory is an explanation that has been rigorously tested and supported by multiple lines of evidence, not just a guess or hypothesis.
The Royal Society, founded in 1660 in London, is the oldest national scientific institution dedicated to the advancement of knowledge. It was established by a group of scholars and enthusiasts who aimed to promote scientific research and the dissemination of scientific knowledge. The society has played a crucial role in the development of modern scientific practices and continues to support scientific endeavors today.