0
Scientists can reach conclusions about a hypothesis after conducting systematic experiments and collecting data that either supports or refutes it. This typically involves repeated trials, peer review, and statistical analysis to ensure the results are reliable and valid. If the evidence consistently supports the hypothesis, it may be accepted as a theory; if not, the hypothesis may be revised or rejected. Ultimately, conclusions are drawn based on the weight of the evidence gathered through rigorous scientific methods.
What else can I help you with?
Evaluating observations and data to reach conclusions is what?
The scientific method.
What do scientist do after they reach conclusions in their experiment?
communicate their results to other people
Can a hypothesis be proven disproved by a single experiment?
A hypothesis cannot be definitively proven or disproven by a single experiment, as scientific inquiry relies on repeated testing and evidence accumulation. A single experiment may provide evidence that supports or contradicts a hypothesis, but it is essential to conduct multiple experiments to account for variables and ensure reliability. Additionally, scientific conclusions are often drawn from a body of evidence rather than isolated instances. Thus, while one experiment can challenge a hypothesis, it typically requires a broader validation to reach a definitive conclusion.
What is known as Deducted reasoning from a general principle?
Deductive reasoning is a logical process where conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises to reach specific conclusions. It starts with a general statement or hypothesis and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical outcome. For example, if all humans are mortal (general principle) and Socrates is a human, then one can deduce that Socrates is mortal (specific conclusion). This method is fundamental in mathematics and formal logic, ensuring that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
Which scientist process skill involves comparing observations and data to reach a conclusion?
The scientist process skill that involves comparing observations and data to reach a conclusion is known as "analysis." This skill is crucial for interpreting experimental results and understanding patterns or relationships in the data. By analyzing the information collected, scientists can draw informed conclusions and make predictions based on their findings.
What do scientists do after the reach conclusions from the results of their experiments?
They share the results of the experiment.
Scientists use to organize questions and reach conclusions that are backed by scientific evidence and research?
the Scientific Method
How did scientist reach their conclusions during middle ages?
Scientists have always reached their conclusions by means of observation and reasoning, whether in the middle ages or at any other time.
How did scientists reach their conclusions about the Middle ages?
Scientists use a combination of historical records, archaeological evidence, and scientific analysis of artifacts and materials from the Middle Ages to reach their conclusions. By examining written accounts, studying physical remains, and applying modern scientific techniques, researchers can piece together a more accurate understanding of the time period. Cross-referencing multiple sources and collaborating with experts across different fields help ensure the reliability of their conclusions.
What kind of reasoning moves from general to specific facts in order to reach conclusion?
Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions. This type of reasoning starts with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against evidence to reach a logical conclusion.
How did scientists reach their conclusions during the middle ages?
During the Middle Ages, scientists relied heavily on philosophical and religious beliefs to guide their research and conclusions. They often used deductive reasoning based on previous knowledge rather than experimental evidence. The Church also played a significant role in shaping scientific thought during this time period.
What significant conclusions did aristarchus an astronomer reach?
lkWJehdfdjksl'
Evaluating observations and data to reach conclusions is what?
The scientific method.
Scientists sometimes have several different hypotheses about why things are the way they are?
Yes, scientists have lots of different hypotheses about why things are the way they are. A hypothesis is actually just an educated guess. (Say you put two pots of water on the stove, one with three cups of water and the other with half a cup. A hypothesis might be that the pot with half a cup will take less time to start boiling, or to reach a certain temperature.) To scientists, a theory is a hypothesis that has been supported by lots and lots of experiments. So when a scientist says they have a hypothesis - it means they have an educated guess, when they say they have a theory - it means they are pretty sure this is true. There are few absolutes in science.
The hypothesis states that when rocks are deformed they bend and then break releasing stored energy?
This is a statement, not a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a testable explanation for a phenomenon based on observations and prior knowledge. A hypothesis for this scenario could be: "If rocks are subjected to stress beyond their elastic limit, then they will deform by bending until they reach a breaking point, releasing stored energy in the form of seismic waves."
What do scientist do after they reach conclusions in their experiment?
communicate their results to other people
How many the survey use ratios to reach conclusions?
the sentence is related to it
