0
yes
in a different problem, otherwise it's a tautology
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
What is deductive validity?
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
What is inferring by science?
to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence -Dictionary.com Simple terms it means creating a conclusion based on everything you've learned from some sort of experiment.
How is evidence from data used to support the conclusion?
booboo penis
What is the data from an experiment which used to verify or reject the original hypothesis in the conclusion?
Evidence is data from an experiment which is used to verify or reject the original hypothesis in the conclusion. Evidence is gathered through the scientific method.
What is intermediate conclusion?
conclusions that are used as a premises in a continuing chain of reasoning
When these type of words are used in an argument they are indicator that the premises had been made and a conclusion will soon follow?
Conclusion indicators
How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?
You will have to make a logical inference for the premises, and a logical deduction for the conclusion.
A syllogism includes two premises and what else?
A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
What is included with two premises in a syllogism?
A conclusion.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A valid argument is one in which the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. An invalid argument is one in which the truth of the premises does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In invalid arguments, the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What kind of reasoning proceeds from premises that are known to be true and is then used to arrive at a conclusion that is also known to be true?
Deductive Reasoning
What is the definition of the word 'premises' and an example of it in a sentence?
Premises has two definitions:Premises can refer to a house or building, along with its land and outbuildings, usually occupied by a business or being used for a formal or official purpose.'Alcohol was not to be served on the premises during the party.'A premise refers to a statement or proposition which is followed by a form of conclusion.'The premise was followed by an affirmative conclusion.'
What is the act of drawing the wrong conclusion from two premises?
logic
Can an argument with a true premises and true conclusion be invalid?
Yes. It could be a coincidence that the premises and conclusion are all true. For example, here is an argument: 1. It is true that if a person belongs to the Republican Party they must be an American. 2. Mitt Romney is an American. 3. Therefore, the conclusion is that Mitt Romney is a Republican. Although both premises and the conclusion are true, the argument is not valid. That is because it is possible to imagine an argument in this form where the premises were true, but the conclusion is not. (Imagine if the second premise were "Barack Obama is an American" which is true, leading to the conclusion "Barack Obama is a Republican" which is false.)
