0
What else can I help you with?
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
What is deductive validity?
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
A t is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific premises or observations. It typically consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the two premises. For example, if all humans are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a human (minor premise), then it concludes that Socrates is mortal. This method of reasoning helps to clarify relationships between different statements and can be used to derive new knowledge from established facts.
What question would help in determining whether the conclusion above valid?
To determine whether the conclusion is valid, you could ask, "What evidence supports the premises leading to this conclusion?" This question encourages an examination of the logical connections and the reliability of the data or assumptions that underpin the conclusion. Additionally, asking, "Are there any counterexamples or alternative explanations that challenge this conclusion?" can help assess its robustness.
If it is valid when a conclusion must be based on what?
A conclusion must be based on sound reasoning and relevant evidence. It should follow logically from the premises or information provided, ensuring that the relationship between them is clear and justifiable. Additionally, the quality and reliability of the evidence play a crucial role in determining the validity of the conclusion.
What is intermediate conclusion?
conclusions that are used as a premises in a continuing chain of reasoning
What kind of reasoning proceeds from premises that are known to be true and is then used to arrive at a conclusion that is also known to be true?
Deductive reasoning proceeds from known true premises to a logically necessary true conclusion. This type of reasoning guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.
What is the conclusion that can be drawn if all the premises of an argument are true?
If all the premises of an argument are true, then the conclusion drawn from those premises is likely to be valid and logically sound.
When these type of words are used in an argument they are indicator that the premises had been made and a conclusion will soon follow?
These types of words are called conclusion indicators. They signal to the listener or reader that the argument is reaching a conclusion based on the presented premises. Examples of conclusion indicators include "thus," "therefore," and "so".
How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?
To add a premises and conclusion to an incomplete argument, first identify the main point being made. Then, find additional supporting reasons or evidence that lead to that main point to form the premises. Finally, state a clear conclusion that follows logically from the premises provided. Make sure the premises adequately support the conclusion for a strong and coherent argument.
A syllogism includes two premises and what else?
A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.
Is an argument valid or invalid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. - Valid arguments are deductive. - Arguments are valid if the premises lead to the conclusion without committing a fallacy. - If an argument is valid, that means that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. - This means that a valid argument with a false premise can lead to a false conclusion. This is called a valid, unsound argument. - A valid, sound argument would be when, if the premises are true the conclusion must be true and the premises are true.
What is deductive argument?
A deductive argument is and argument that the premises are claimed to give sufficient support for the conclusion to follow. The premises are repeated in the conclusion. Often the conclusion does not have any new information. eg The moon is circular when it is full the moon is circular therefore the moon is full.
What is a logical conclusion derived from premises known or assumed to be true?
A logical conclusion is a statement that can be inferred from the premises based on the rules of logic. It is the result of applying deductive reasoning to ensure that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
What makes a valid deductive argument?
A valid deductive argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The form of the argument must be such that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.
