A result can be tested by others through the principles of reproducibility and falsifiability, which are key characteristics of scientific inquiry. If a claim can be independently verified through experimentation and yields consistent results, it aligns with science. In contrast, pseudoscience often lacks this testability, relying on anecdotal evidence or claims that cannot be empirically challenged. Therefore, the ability to replicate findings is a crucial factor in distinguishing between science and pseudoscience.
The two main goals of science are: -Hypothesize and Experiment: make an educated guess and conduct an activity to prove your hypothesis -Answer and Conclude: Discuss the results and share with others
comparing means the word itself "compare" compare means you put two or more objects and you see the differences and observe them.
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.
Scientific method uses rules, but is more than just a set of rules. The word Science comes from the Latin and means to know.It is the careful study of a subject, and the formulation of an hypothesis to explain the observations. The explanation should be open to criticism, and the results of any experiment should be repeatable by others. It should be open to an extrapolation of the results, and thus have some predictive value.
A result can be tested by others through the principles of reproducibility and falsifiability, which are key characteristics of scientific inquiry. If a claim can be independently verified through experimentation and yields consistent results, it aligns with science. In contrast, pseudoscience often lacks this testability, relying on anecdotal evidence or claims that cannot be empirically challenged. Therefore, the ability to replicate findings is a crucial factor in distinguishing between science and pseudoscience.
The difference between science and (sudo) pseudoscience is that science is based on factual information gathered without a person biased opinion. but on the other hand pseudoscience is twisting facts to suite a often crazy postulate (often based on racism or something conspiratorial to show others that this misinformation is in-fact information.
Nazi propaganda often used pseudoscience to make claims about the superiority of the Aryan race over others. Eugenics based on this pseudoscience was one of the atrocities that occurred in concentration camps.
2- Accurate experiments, 2- Keenobservations 3- conclusions, 4- Results confirmed by others.
ask the question backround research construct hypothesis test with an experiment analize results report results
the scientific process is when you conduct and experiment re check your results over and over again then have those results posted in a scientific journal for others to check before having it pretty much verified as scientific fact unless someone finds faults in you experiments or results.
The two main goals of science are: -Hypothesize and Experiment: make an educated guess and conduct an activity to prove your hypothesis -Answer and Conclude: Discuss the results and share with others
In a science experiment you should follow established scientific protocols, ensure than your work is properly documented and publish the results so that others can repeat the experiment and verify the result.
In a science fair project, a graph visually represents the data collected during the experiment. It helps to show relationships and patterns in the data in a clear and organized way, making it easier for others to interpret and understand the results of the project. Graphs can include bar graphs, line graphs, pie charts, and scatter plots, among others.
Encouraging openmindedness, and the ability to draw conclusions from the bare facts rather than always relying on others.
comparing means the word itself "compare" compare means you put two or more objects and you see the differences and observe them.
Formally for a theory answer, no. In practice, yes. A very important part of the process of science requires that other researchers test new theories of others, which requires that it be communicated.