Not if it is a valid "law".
Note that whenever you do break one, the science must chance.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
how are scientific laws formed
There are countless scientific laws. Maybe you mean Newtons famous three laws of motion.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Scientific laws. Scientific laws. Scientific laws. Scientific laws.
A scientific law is a statement describing observable phenomena. Laws are based on repeated observations and experimentation, so they are not typically "broken." If an event seems to contradict a scientific law, it may indicate a limitation in our understanding or a need to revise the law.
The duration of Broken Laws is 1.17 hours.
No, they can't. A scientific law is the description of an observed phenomenon. It doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. These are not like the laws that society impose on people.
Broken Laws was created on 1924-11-09.
Both scientific laws and scientific theorys can be changed if something new comes up in the scientific world.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
Theories are observations held to be true based on their application to observation and proven scientific laws.
how are scientific laws formed
No
no.
Scientific laws cannot normally tell you the answer to the questions that start with "WHY?". For example, "Why are we here?".