There is no absolute knowledge in science that can never be disproven even in principle. It does sometimes turn out that scientists are wrong, and what they considered to be a fact turns out not to be one. I would add that it is more usual for scientists to revise theories, than to reject what was considered to be a fact, but it does happen.
Dependent variable
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''
A hypothesis is a proposition to be proven or disproven by experiment or, in the case of statistics, to be assessed for its likelihood based on the numbers available.
Yes, in the Scientific Method, the problem / question / observation is the subject of the investigation. Once the question exists, a hypothesis / conjecture can be made, which can be proven or disproven through experimentation.
Einstein found that the fasting moving object is light. September 2011, scientists found that neutrinos travel faster than light.
Yes, facts can be disproven if new evidence or information emerges that contradicts the previously accepted fact. This process is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method and the pursuit of knowledge.
Yes
Yes, theories can be disproven if evidence is found that directly contradicts their predictions or explanations. This is a fundamental part of the scientific method, where theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence.
A scientific law is an indisputable fact: there are no observances dictating it. For example, gravity is a scientific law. A scientific theory is simply a generally accepted explanation for a particular phenomenon or idea that cannot currently be proven or disproven. The structure of the atom and evolution are theories.
Dependent variable
A scintific law is a statement that describes what scientisis expect to happen. A scintififc theory is a well-tested explantion for a range of observations. This answers the question '' How Does Scientific Law Differ From Scientific Theroy?''
If a fact is proven wrong, it is said to have been disproven.
falsifiability. This principle suggests that for a scientific claim to be valid, it must be testable and potentially refutable through evidence and observation. By being able to be disproven, scientific claims can be rigorously tested and evaluated for accuracy.
Yes, theories can be disproven through empirical evidence that contradicts their predictions or explanations. This process is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, where theories are constantly tested and refined based on new data and observations.
Ignored by creationists -Excuse me, but I think the term 'overruled' or 'disproven' would work best in that statement.
a scientific fact is called data.
A scientific hypothesis is testable, falsifiable, and based on empirical evidence. It must be formulated in a way that allows it to be disproven through experimentation or observation, making it a key component of the scientific method.