Not so much changed, but simply modified to the current consensus of the scientific community. Dark Matter Energy is somehow composing 75% of the mass of this Universe. Only 25% of the mass is composed of stars, planets, black holes, etc. The theory is that the Universe will continue expanding forever pulling everything apart by this unseen and undetectable mass surrounding us out there. Even after the last sun burns out there will be an absolute light zero and space temperature zero(-454F) throughout the entire Universe. Atoms will even be ripped apart by this Universal Black Wasteland, leaving a vapor trail of molecules waiting for the next beginning. That may be what will set up the beginnings for the next Universe.
They have invented so much technology that brings the world to where it is today. Some inventions were even made by accident!
Theories and scientific laws can be changed if conflicting information is discovered in the future.
If scientific laws changed, then they would not be "scientific". The whole ideas of "science" DEPENDS on finding rules that definedthe environment.
How_Scientific_theories_can_be_changed_or_replaced_when
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
How_Scientific_theories_can_be_changed_or_replaced_when
Scientific theories can be changed or replaced when there has been significant evidence for the change. The scientific method must be used to create a new hypothesis, which must then be proven.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
When there are more convincing theories occur and proved experimentally, scientist will modify or change the current theories.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
Theories can be changed or rejected if and when the scientific evidence no longer supports the theory.
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
The Law of Universal Gravitation
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
A scientific theory is something that is tried and tested, and not yet disproven. It is close to being scientific 'fact' as you can get. Not all hypotheses will become theories because sometimes they get disproven. That means the hypothesis will need to be changed and tested again.
Theories are changed constantly. In fact, many known theories today are only theories from that of someone else only with an improvement. Many scientific theories for example are developed that way. Take this for example, many thought the world was flat, that theory developed (changed) to the fact that the world is round instead of flat. Current theories that are changing daily-- "How was the universe formed?" "How did life begin"? "Was there ever life on Mars"? "What is all that DNA for?" "How do we make more efficient solar cells?" "What will happen with global warming, and how can we modify it?"