Not so much changed, but simply modified to the current consensus of the scientific community. Dark Matter Energy is somehow composing 75% of the mass of this Universe. Only 25% of the mass is composed of stars, planets, black holes, etc. The theory is that the Universe will continue expanding forever pulling everything apart by this unseen and undetectable mass surrounding us out there. Even after the last sun burns out there will be an absolute light zero and space temperature zero(-454F) throughout the entire Universe. Atoms will even be ripped apart by this Universal Black Wasteland, leaving a vapor trail of molecules waiting for the next beginning. That may be what will set up the beginnings for the next Universe.
How_Scientific_theories_can_be_changed_or_replaced_when
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
How_Scientific_theories_can_be_changed_or_replaced_when
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
Scientific theories have changed over time as new evidence is discovered through experiments and observations. As technology advances, scientists can gather more accurate data and refine their theories accordingly. Additionally, the acceptance and rejection of ideas by the scientific community also influence the evolution of scientific theories.
Scientific theories can be changed or replaced when there has been significant evidence for the change. The scientific method must be used to create a new hypothesis, which must then be proven.
yes because theories are always changed when found new evidence
whenever an experiment fails to confirm the theory it is no longer a theory ... it becomes a hypothesis
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
The scientific term that could describe the group of prisoners who changed their diet in Goldberger's experiment is the "experimental group." This group would be compared to a control group to determine the effects of the changed diet.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
Theories are changed constantly. In fact, many known theories today are only theories from that of someone else only with an improvement. Many scientific theories for example are developed that way. Take this for example, many thought the world was flat, that theory developed (changed) to the fact that the world is round instead of flat. Current theories that are changing daily-- "How was the universe formed?" "How did life begin"? "Was there ever life on Mars"? "What is all that DNA for?" "How do we make more efficient solar cells?" "What will happen with global warming, and how can we modify it?"
Laws can only be changed if enough evidence has been given to disprove the law and place another law in its place. Theories change all the time. Theories are basically a question that scientist try to answer. Theories are just an idea that scientists give as an explanation to a question but they are not sure yet
Yes, scientific theories can change or be revised as new evidence is discovered and our understanding of the natural world evolves. This process is fundamental to the scientific method and helps to ensure that our theories align with the most up-to-date knowledge available.