The most important reason for repeating an experimental investigation is to verify the reliability and validity of the results. Repetition helps identify any inconsistencies or errors in the original experiment, ensuring that findings are not due to chance or experimental bias. Additionally, repeated experiments strengthen the overall conclusions and contribute to the robustness of scientific knowledge by confirming that the observed effects are reproducible under the same conditions.
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer
There are no following principles listed in the question.
In the troubleshooting process, it is important to correctly identify the problem at the beginning. This will help prevent repeating repair processes.
The correct order of a scientific investigation typically follows these steps: first, identify a question or problem to investigate; next, conduct background research and formulate a hypothesis; then, design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis; and finally, analyze the data, draw conclusions, and communicate the results. This process often involves repeating steps as necessary to refine the investigation.
Repeating trials after reaching a conclusion helps to ensure the reliability and validity of the results. It allows researchers to determine if their findings are consistent and not due to random chance or experimental error. Additionally, repeated trials can help identify any anomalies and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied. Ultimately, this practice strengthens the overall credibility of the investigation.
repeating a investigation can help to confirm your results. If you try an experiment once, it could be wrong so try it again and repeat it to confirm the results.
Sometimes results of a particular experiment do not match our hypothesis. Most of the time in such a case hypothesis is modified to agree to the experimental data. Another approach can be repeating the same experiment again and comparing the the values form the second trial to the first one.
cell cycle
1. Its important because if you repeat you'll get consistent results. 2. That means if a scientist gets different results it means they did something wrong in the experiment
Replication
Cell Cycle
They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer
They will need to keep redoing it until everyone has the same answer
In the long run, u might find some evidence u did not find before.
Replication is crucial in experimental research because it helps to verify the reliability and validity of findings. By repeating experiments, researchers can determine whether initial results were due to chance or specific experimental conditions. Replication also enhances the credibility of scientific claims and contributes to the accumulation of evidence, ensuring that conclusions are robust and generalizable across different contexts. Ultimately, it fosters trust in the scientific process and supports the advancement of knowledge.
There are no following principles listed in the question.