after it has been evaluated and tested repeatedly
constant
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
This is a bit of a toughy really. Scientific theory can be thought of as falling into one of 3 categories. 1. Law. This is something that is generally accepted by all of the scientific community or the vast majority of those within the specific scientific field. e.g. Newton's Laws of motion etc 2 Theory. This is widely accepted by most of the scientific community or large amount of those in a specific field although opposing theories may exist. 3. Hypothesis (literally meaning below thesis or lower than theory). Is generally a new discovery or procedure to be introduced to the scientific community. So, coming back to your question: The purest scientific theory would probably be defined as Law, thus being accepted by all or the majority of the scientific community. Hope this helps.
after it has been evaluated and tested repeatedly
Alfred Wegener was the proponent of the Continental Drift Theory. The scientific community accepted this theory due to the phenomena of paleomagnetism, sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.
how well existing scientific data are explained by the new theory.
constant
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
The theory that is widely accepted as true in the scientific community is known as the scientific theory. This type of theory is based on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation, and has withstood rigorous testing and scrutiny.
The merit of a new scientific theory is judged by the scientific community based on its ability to explain existing data, make testable predictions, and withstand rigorous scrutiny through peer review and replication of results. The theory's coherence, explanatory power, and ability to advance our understanding of the natural world are also important factors in determining its acceptance within the scientific community.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
This is a bit of a toughy really. Scientific theory can be thought of as falling into one of 3 categories. 1. Law. This is something that is generally accepted by all of the scientific community or the vast majority of those within the specific scientific field. e.g. Newton's Laws of motion etc 2 Theory. This is widely accepted by most of the scientific community or large amount of those in a specific field although opposing theories may exist. 3. Hypothesis (literally meaning below thesis or lower than theory). Is generally a new discovery or procedure to be introduced to the scientific community. So, coming back to your question: The purest scientific theory would probably be defined as Law, thus being accepted by all or the majority of the scientific community. Hope this helps.
No. He died in 1930 and it wasn't until the sixties that the theory was accepted by the mainstream scientific community.