No you more inertia in outer space than anywhere else.
There is no antonym for outer space.
I mean have More, Less,or the Same Intertia
because a heavier person has more inertia, and therefore the forces that work to slow the person down, i.e. friction, wind resistance, whatever, will have less effect on an object with more inertia than less inertia
It's not the only reason, but the same force will produce less acceleration in a body with more inertia.
The inertia of a body can be defined as the relunctance of a body to acceleration. The mass of a body can be defined as a measure of the inertia of a body. This is because acceleration = resultant force / mass. So, if mass is greater, the less will be the acceleration of the body and hence the greater the inertia.
When it an object in space in moving it will keep moving at the same speed with the property of inertia. Then moon is an object that has inertia. Gravity keeps the moon from going off into outer space but inertia keeps the moon from crashing into the moon. Gravity and inertia have to be balanced in order for an object to remain in orbit.
Inertia
That is an idiotic question. To get home! Without fuel in outer space, the ship would keep its current inertia and be lost. Fuel is used to change the trajectory of the ship.
Yep, if an astronaut has mass, they will have inertia.
An object with less mass will have less inertia. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its motion, so objects with less mass will require less force to accelerate or decelerate.
In outer space they sit in a small trapeze and the astronaut is moved back and forth to measure his mass by inertia.
An object with less mass has less inertia. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its state of motion, so objects with less mass will require less force to accelerate or decelerate.
outer (as in "outer space")
Gravity and inertia.
There is no antonym for outer space.
outer (as in "outer space")
they built it in outer space