0
What else can I help you with?
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
How do scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis?
Scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis by conducting experiments and collecting data to test its predictions. They analyze the results statistically to assess if the evidence supports the hypothesis or not. If the data consistently contradicts the hypothesis, it is rejected; if it aligns with the predictions, the hypothesis may be accepted or revised accordingly. Peer review and replication of results by other scientists further validate the findings.
Why is it important that scientist know and accept their limitations?
why is it important that scientists know and accept their limitations?
When would scientists accept a theory?
probably when you can prove it
Which scientific attitude shows a scientist who is willing to accept different ideas that he might agree with?
The scientific attitude that reflects a willingness to accept different ideas is known as open-mindedness. This quality allows scientists to consider alternative hypotheses and viewpoints, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues. By remaining open to new evidence and perspectives, scientists can refine their theories and contribute to the advancement of knowledge.
Why don't scientists accept the steady state theory?
Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.
Is it true or false the Scientists accept ideas from the past but will revise them when new evidence is discovered?
true
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Why did many scientists not accept the early theiories of continental drifts?
Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.
What do scientists think about the theory of evolution?
The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
Why are scientists more reluctant to accept Charles Darwin's theory?
Scientists were having the same problem that Darwin thought would happen. In Darwin's mind his theory took away the need for a God. Darwin's theory of evolution challenged both the Religious and the science community. Some scientists still have the same shallow mind that other scientists had during Darwin's time.
Why did scientists in 1915 not accept wegeners idea of continental drift?
Scientists in 1915 did not accept Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift because he lacked a plausible mechanism for how the continents could move. Additionally, Wegener's ideas were seen as radical and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs of the time, so there was resistance to accepting his theory without more concrete evidence. The technology available at the time also did not provide the necessary tools to support Wegener's hypothesis.
Do Jewish scientists believe in genesis or the big bang theory?
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
Why is providing evidence to support your position an important part of building an argument?
Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.
Will the judge accept money orders as proof of child support payment?
Maybe. It depends on all the other evidence, both oral and documentary, that is presented.
How can the Scientific Revolution be seen as a conflict between authority and evidence?
The Scientific Revolution was a conflict between authority and evidence. Authority came in the form of the Church, which did not want to accept new scientific ideas. Evidence came in the form of experiments and observations that scientists were coming up with that were proven true repeatedly.
How do scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis?
Scientists determine whether to accept or reject their hypothesis by conducting experiments and collecting data to test its predictions. They analyze the results statistically to assess if the evidence supports the hypothesis or not. If the data consistently contradicts the hypothesis, it is rejected; if it aligns with the predictions, the hypothesis may be accepted or revised accordingly. Peer review and replication of results by other scientists further validate the findings.
