Logically speaking, 300 is less than 3 and you would need to either subtract or divide to go from bigger to smaller, right? Since there is 100 centimeters (cm) in 1 meter (m), following the pattern there would be 300 centimeters in 3 meters. Another way to figure it out is to do 300 divided by 3 and you would get 100(Or vice versa, 300 divided by 3 and get 100). You can also do reverse and do 100 times 3 and you will get 300. Both ways work.
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that
1 m=100 cm
so,3 m =300 cm
so,300 cm is equal to 3m
3, bring the imaginary decimal to the left 2 times to get the answer, 300., 3.00
That is impossible. Three does not equal 300!
No. 3000cm is 30m. 300cm is 3m.
3 metres
30 dm
1 meter = 100 centimeters3 meters is equal to 300 cm.Therefore, 3 meters is larger than 200 centimeters.
35 cm 300 - 265 = 35
There are 100 centimetres in one metre. Therefore 300 centimetres is equal to 300/100 = 3 metres.
it is equal to like 430 cm if converted correctly :)
1800 cm = 18 m
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that 1 m=100 cm so,3 m =300 cm so,300 cm is equal to 3m
100 cm = 1 m, so 300/100 ie 3 m
300 cm
300 cm = 3 m = 9.843 ft (rounded)
Since 1 meter = 100 cm, then 3 m = 300 cm.
100 cm = 1 m ⇒ 300 cm = 300 ÷ 100 m = 3 m
That is correct. 3000 cm is NOT 3 m
100 cm = 1 m So 3 m = 300 cm
3 m = 300 cm which makes it bigger than 200 cm
3 meters
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that 1 m=100 cm 3 m =300 cm 3 m 25 cm=300 + 25 =325 cm
1 m = 100 cm2 m = 200 cm3 m = 300 cm...30 m = 3,000 cm