yes
No. Observations come first, followed by a hypothesis as to what might be happening. This is then developed into a theory which purports to explain the observations, supporting or rebutting the original hypothesis. Experiments are then used to validate the theory into the realm of fact.
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
Scientific Law
Observations form the basis of hypothesis, Mathematical modelling builds a therory based on the hypothesis. Proof of the validity of the model forms the law.
scientific theory is something they believe and a law is something that always happensscientific law means a phenomenon of nature that has been proven to inveriable occur whenever certain conditions excistscientific law: a statement or equation that can predict what will happen in certain situationsscientific theory: a scientific explanation that connects and explains many observations
A pattern describes many observations but does not explain them. Patterns may be observed in data or phenomena, but the underlying cause or mechanism behind the pattern is not fully understood.
In chemistry, the scientific approach involves making observations, forming hypotheses to explain the observations, testing these hypotheses through experiments, and developing theories that can explain a set of related observations. A scientific law is a concise statement or equation that describes a fundamental relationship or pattern in nature that has been consistently observed through experiments. It represents a well-established fact that is widely accepted in the scientific community.
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
the value of scientific law is the set of observations...
Scientific laws are concise descriptions of a wide variety of observations based on empirical evidence. Observations are the data and information collected through experiments and studies that form the basis for scientific laws. Together, scientific laws and observations help to explain and predict natural phenomena in a systematic and replicable way.
No. Observations come first, followed by a hypothesis as to what might be happening. This is then developed into a theory which purports to explain the observations, supporting or rebutting the original hypothesis. Experiments are then used to validate the theory into the realm of fact.
Is a scientific law an explaination of thing or events based on observations of an explariment
No, scientific laws describe what happens under certain conditions, based on repeated observations and experiments. They do not explain why things happen, but provide a framework for understanding and predicting natural phenomena.
The relationship is, in order to become a scientific law, you have to have many observations by many different people. If you want to prove it is not a theory, you have to observe it.
a phenomenon of nature that has been proven to invariably
A scientific theory attempts to explain observations by construction a system of mechanisms by which the observations can be accurately predicted.A scientific law is simply a statement summarizing the results of observations without providing any attempt at explaining the observations.For example, Newtonian physics is a scientific theory that attempts to explain, amongst other things, the motion of objects when subjected to gravity.The law of gravity is merely a mathematical formula that describes the force of gravity felt between any two objects (with limitations if the objects are incredibly small - see quantum mechanics) but does not attempt to explain why the formula is what it is. Scientific laws simply summarize the empirical (observed) data available.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.