It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven.
The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
C. Repeatable
Apex Experimental results are not reliable if they are not repeatable.
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
I do not know, but I do know that an experiment is a repeatable, practical test of an hypothesis.
Yes it is true
C. Repeatable
a control group assures that an experiment will be repeatable
Apex Experimental results are not reliable if they are not repeatable.
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
Yes it is true
I do not know, but I do know that an experiment is a repeatable, practical test of an hypothesis.
My hypothesis was correct when my experiment was done and my data was repeatable.
In scientific terms, "repeatable" means that if you do the same experiment several times, you will get very close to exactly the same results each time.
To be scientifically proven, however for your own observations and interests not really. To make a scientific hypthosis into a fact and eventually a lawyour experiment must be repeatable by other scientists (explorers/pioneers of our world
Yes, the experiment is designed in a way that allows for the results to be repeated or reproduced by other researchers.
to represent the population.at random. -apex (;
Your experiment must be able to be repeated so you can conduct multiple trials, thus eliminating errors. It must also be able to be replicated so other scientists can repeat it themselves.