Sometimes Yes, as in Pythagoras' Theorem. Other times No, for as Godel's Incompleteness Theorem shows, there will be complete bodies of knowledge in which there will be truths that cannot be proven, and falsities which cannot be denied. [I paraphrase his theorem.]
pop science
The purpose of the scientific theory is the proof of science and how the scientist were thinking before. Hope it helps =) H***On ;*
all the answers are correct
A theory is an idea system with a lot of evidence to support it--for example, the theory of evolution. A law (in science) is an idea system with proof attached to it--no contradictions--example, the law of gravitation.
there might not be enough proof
Science deals with building a body of knowledge through evidence-based investigations and observations. It aims to explain phenomena based on the available evidence but does not aim to offer absolute proof. This is because scientific understanding is always evolving with new evidence and perspectives.
The whole science of spectroscopy is proof of it.
There is no conclusive proof to support either view.
pop science
Even with new technology there is still no conclusive proof that ghosts are in fact real. While believers point to orbs, shadows, and mist phenomenon caught on camera as "proof" no scientific peer reviewed literature exists on the topic. Until science takes on that cause it will always be a matter of belief.
The purpose of the scientific theory is the proof of science and how the scientist were thinking before. Hope it helps =) H***On ;*
At home, a theory indefinite and to be treated with some skepticism. In science, a theory is as close you can get to absolute truth without being a law of nature. Theories in science require much experimentation, analysis, and proof, though they can be disproved by later research.
When writing a story, you must include an introduction, body and conclusion. I hope my Science project will come to a satisfactory conclusion. At the conclusion of his speech, he gave his contact information.
Theories in science are supported by evidence and not ' proved. ' That said, one would think that the variation in the sexes mating stratagies would offer some strong cross cultural evidence.
all the answers are correct
This study is called cryptozoology.
Science cannot provide definitive proof of anything because nobody knows everything. You can always make another observation or take another measurement. That observation might possibly change our understanding of a phenomenon in some tiny way. It might even change it in such an important way that we have to re-think our understanding altogether. You can never be sure that nobody can think of a new explanation that accounts of all the observations of any given phenomenon up to now. But this lack of definitive proof does not stop science from providing reliable explanations of how nature works. Aircraft fly, mobile phones work, and vaccines prevent you from getting ill. All of these technological wonders depend on science, and we can be confident that the science on which they are based describes the world accurately. The more evidence available to science, the more accurate that description becomes, and the more confident you can be that the plane will not suddenly become subject to a previously unknown law that causes it to plummet to Earth. Science is a lot better than myth at explaining how to build, for example, a functional jet engine. Definitive proof is not, and has never been, the aim of science. Science is a careful mapping of nature, and just as a map is not the same thing as the land it maps, but always a simplification, science is never the same thing as the phenomena it describes, but always a simplification. As science progresses in any field, its predictions get closer and closer to observation. A scientific theory is a body of knowledge that makes accurate predictions and is utterly reliable for all practical purposes - like putting humans on the Moon.