YES
That is the normal way it happens
Yes. The next step is to try and gather enough evidence to support the hypothesis.
False
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Nothing is following.
That is the normal way it happens
Yes. The next step is to try and gather enough evidence to support the hypothesis.
False
No... scientific inquiry begins by coming up with a question. From there you develop a hypothesis, test the hypothesis, alter your hypothesis if need be, test again, etc. Only after you have data that supports your hypothesis (if it ever does) do you draw any conclusions. If your data consistently does not support your hypothesis, no matter how it is modified, you may draw conclusions about your basic contentions as well. YES BUT..... what should you ask yourself in drawing a conclusion about an experiment?
Ask a QuestionDo Background ResearchConstruct a HypothesisTest Your Hypothesis by Doing an ExperimentAnalyze Your Data and Draw a ConclusionCommunicate Your Results
Nothing is following.
Evidence.
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories
1. Use your experience to help you characterize the problem. 2. Form a conjecture (or hypothesis) that explains the observations and measurements of the subject. 3. Deduce a prediction from that explanation (reasoning including logical deduction[30] from the hypothesis). 4. Test - conduct experiments that test the predictions. 5. Publish and subject the above to the scrutiny of your scientific peers.
A scientific hypothesis is a testable explanation for a phenomenon or a proposed solution to a scientific problem. It is often based on observations and prior knowledge, and serves as a starting point for further research and experimentation.
Yes, it is reasonable for a scientist to make an educated guess, often referred to as a hypothesis, before conducting experiments. This hypothesis is based on existing knowledge, observations, and previous research, guiding the experimental design and focus. It helps to formulate predictions that can be tested, ultimately contributing to the scientific method and advancing understanding in the field. Making an educated guess is a critical step in the iterative process of scientific inquiry.
Scientists often repeat scientific investigations to verify that the results for a hypothesis or a group of hypotheses are correct. This can lead to a scientific theory.